Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37829600›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023

Can the Pfannenstiel skin incision length be adjusted according to the fetal head during elective cesarean delivery?

Baris Kaya, Ozlen Emekci Ozay, Ali Cenk Ozay, Abdullah Tüten

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05632796 (Can the Length of the Pfannenstiel Skin Incision be Adjusted According to the Fetal Head During Elective/Planned Cesarean Delivery?), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05632796 nacompletednot on this map

Can the Length of the Pfannenstiel Skin Incision be Adjusted According to the Fetal Head During Elective/Planned Cesarean Delivery?

TypeinterventionalSponsorNear East University, TurkeyRan2017 to 2021Enrolled115ConditionsIncision, Surgical, Cesarean Delivery Affecting Fetus, Pfannenstiel Incision Length, Fetal Occipitofrontal DiameterArmsAdjusting the Pfannenstiel skin incision according to the occipitofrontal diameter (OFD) of the fetal head.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Baris KayaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura State Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ozlen Emekci OzayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cyprus International University School of Medicine, Lefkosa-TRNC, Mersin, Türkiye.
Ali Cenk OzayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cyprus International University School of Medicine, Lefkosa-TRNC, Mersin, Türkiye.
Abdullah TütenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cerrahpasa University School of Medicine Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Cyprus International University · CYIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRState Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to determine whether the Pfannenstiel skin incision can be adjusted according to the fetal head's occipitofrontal diameter (OFD) during primary cesarean delivery. Background: Eligible 114 nulliparous women delivered at term by cesarean section in which Pfannenstiel skin incision was performed according to the OFD of the fetal head between June 2017 and September 2021 were included. Excluded cases were non-vertex presentations, all emergency cesarean sections, severe preeclampsia, women in an active phase of the first stage of labor and second stage of labor, placenta previa and low-lying placenta, multiple pregnancies, and uncontrolled gestational diabetes mellitus. Results: Among 114 eligible nulliparous women, the mean OFD was 116.1 ± 7.2 (99-138) mm, and the measurement of the Pfannenstiel skin incision length, which was performed according to the OFD was found to be 122.8 ± 9.2 (100-155) mm. The difference between OFD and Pfannenstiel incision kept remained within 10 mm in 90 (82.5.2%), 10-20 mm in 17 (15.5%), and more than 20 mm in two women (1.8%). This technique was successful in 109 (95.6%) out of 114 women without extending the skin incision. In five women, skin incision needed to be extended up to 38 mm. In 10 women (8.7%), the rectus abdominis muscle was cut partially to deliver the fetal head. The mean fetal umbilical artery pH was 7.33 ± 0.05. No neonatal hypoxia was encountered in the study. Conclusion: Pfannenstiel skin incision can be adjusted according to the OFD with minimal margins of error. This technique may provide better cosmetic results by avoiding unnecessarily prolonged incisions with similar newborn outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier [NCT05632796].

Indexed as

Aesthetic cesarean incisioncesarean deliveryincision lengthoccipitofrontal diameterPfannenstiel incision

Identifiers

PMID37829600
PMCPMC10566367
OpenAlexW4387099883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.