Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37829583›Full record

ArticleRadiologia brasileira

Recommendations for breast cancer screening in Brazil, from the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, the Brazilian Society of Mastology, and the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations.

Linei Augusta Brolini Delle Urban, Luciano Fernandes Chala, Ivie Braga de Paula, Selma di Pace Bauab, Marcela Brisighelli Schaefer, Ana Lúcia Kefalás Oliveira, Carlos Shimizu, Tatiane Mendes Gonçalves de Oliveira, Paula de Camargo Moraes, Beatriz Medicis Maranhão Miranda and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Breast MRI to Screen Women With Extremely Dense Breasts.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Review
  6. Brazilian Guideline on Menopausal Cardiovascular Health - 2024.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  7. Maintaining accuracy and expanding access: evaluating the efficacy of the Botucatu Abbreviated Breast MRI Protocol.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Linei Augusta Brolini Delle UrbanMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2017-9776
Luciano Fernandes ChalaCoordinator of the National Mammography Commission of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ivie Braga de PaulaMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Selma di Pace BauabMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Marcela Brisighelli SchaeferMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ana Lúcia Kefalás OliveiraMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Carlos ShimizuMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Tatiane Mendes Gonçalves de OliveiraMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paula de Camargo MoraesMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Beatriz Medicis Maranhão MirandaMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Flávia Engel AduanMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Salete de Jesus Fonseca RegoMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ellyete de Oliveira CanellaMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Henrique Lima CoutoMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Sociedade Brasileira de Mastologia (SBM), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Gustavo Machado BadanMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Sociedade Brasileira de Mastologia (SBM), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
José Luis Esteves FranciscoMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Thaís Paiva MoraesMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia (FEBRASGO), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Rosangela Requi JakubiakMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
João Emílio PeixotoMembers of the National Mammography Commission, Representatives of the Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To present an update of the recommendations of the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, the Brazilian Society of Mastology, and the Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations for breast cancer screening in Brazil. Materials and Methods: Scientific evidence published between January 2012 and July 2022 was gathered from the following databases: Medline (PubMed); Excerpta Medica (Embase); Cochrane Library; Ebsco; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (Cinahl); and Latin-American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (Lilacs). Recommendations were based on that evidence and were arrived at by consensus of a joint committee of experts from the three entities.Recommendations: Annual mammographic screening is recommended for women between 40 and 74 years of age. For women at or above the age of 75, screening should be reserved for those with a life expectancy greater than seven years. Women at higher than average risk are considered by category: those with dense breasts; those with a personal history of atypical lobular hyperplasia, classical lobular carcinoma in situ, or atypical ductal hyperplasia; those previously treated for breast cancer; those having undergone thoracic radiotherapy before age 30; and those with a relevant genetic mutation or a strong family history. The benefits of complementary screening are also addressed according to the subcategories above. The use of tomosynthesis, which is an evolved form of mammography, should be considered in screening, whenever accessible and available.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasms/diagnostic imagingEarly detection of cancerMagnetic resonance imagingMammographyPractice guidelineUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID37829583
PMCPMC10567087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.