Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37829507›Full record

ReviewCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.)2023

Rational Design of Bioactive Materials for Bone Hemostasis and Defect Repair.

Yuqi Gai, Yue Yin, Ling Guan, Shengchang Zhang, Jiatian Chen, Junyuan Yang, Huaijuan Zhou, Jinhua Li

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Recent Progress of Soft and Bioactive Materials in Flexible Bioelectronics.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yuqi GaiSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Yue YinSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8919-6887
Ling GuanAdvanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Sciences, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.
Shengchang ZhangSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Jiatian ChenSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Junyuan YangSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
Huaijuan ZhouAdvanced Research Institute of Multidisciplinary Sciences, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9289-3613
Jinhua LiSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1110-7471
Beijing Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday unnatural events such as trauma, accidents, military conflict, disasters, and even medical malpractice create open wounds and massive blood loss, which can be life-threatening. Fractures and large bone defects are among the most common types of injuries. Traditional treatment methods usually involve rapid hemostasis and wound closure, which are convenient and fast but may result in various complications such as nerve injury, deep infection, vascular injury, and deep hematomas. To address these complications, various studies have been conducted on new materials that can be degraded in the body and reduce inflammation and abscesses in the surgical area. This review presents the latest research progress in biomaterials for bone hemostasis and repair. The mechanisms of bone hemostasis and bone healing are first introduced and then principles for rational design of biomaterials are summarized. After providing representative examples of hemostatic biomaterials for bone repair, future challenges and opportunities in the field are proposed.

Identifiers

PMID37829507
PMCPMC10566342
OpenAlexW4386568222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.