Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37829269›Full record

ArticlePrzeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review2023

A new promising approach to urodynamic stress urinary incontinence care can help menopausal women.

Wael Khafagy, Walaa ElBassioune, Mahmoud Rady, Elmetwally Farouk, Ehab Elhelw, Ahmed Saeed, Ahmed Mahmoud, Hamada Abuelmatti, Ahmed Elsheikh, Mohamed Mahmoud and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wael KhafagyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Walaa ElBassiouneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Mahmoud RadyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Elmetwally FaroukDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Ehab ElhelwDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Ahmed SaeedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Ahmed MahmoudDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Hamada AbuelmattiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Ahmed ElsheikhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Mohamed MahmoudDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Mohammed HusseinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Ahmed ZakyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Ahmed AbdeltawabDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Soliman AliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Muhammad AltorakyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Mahmoud HegazyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Ahmed AlmorsyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Moatazza AlghazalyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Mohamed RehanDepartment of Urology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Esam ElnadyDepartment of Urology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Saed KhaterDepartment of Urology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Alaa MahmoudDepartment of Urology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Ahmed ElsayedDepartment of Urology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Hazem DeifDepartment of Urology, Al-Azhar University, Al-Azhar, Egypt.
Al-Azhar University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of single-incision mini-sling in the surgical treatment of postmenopausal urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) compared to the standard trans-obturator mid-urethral sling. Material and methods: This prospective study was carried out in two tertiary centres; Al-Azhar University Maternity & Urology Hospitals. A total of 120 postmenopausal women with urodynamic SUI were randomized to undergo either single-incision mini-sling ( Results: The single-incision mini-sling (SIMS) and transobturator tape (TOT) groups had no statistically significant difference in subjective and objective cure rates (p > 0.05). Compared with the transvaginal tape O group, patients in the SIMS group had significantly less postoperative pain, shorter operative duration, and less intraoperative blood loss (all Conclusions: Single-incision mini-sling was superior to TOT in postmenopausal as SIMS is of similar effectiveness, more safe and minimally invasive with earlier ambulance.

Indexed as

postmenopausal womensingle-incision mini-slingtrans-obturator mid-urethral slingurodynamic stress urinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID37829269
PMCPMC10566331
OpenAlexW4386785941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.