Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37829204›Full record

ArticleiScience2023

InterOpt: Improved gene expression quantification in qPCR experiments using weighted aggregation of reference genes.

Adel Salimi, Saeid Rahmani, Ali Sharifi-Zarchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adel SalimiComputer Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11155-1639, Tehran, Iran.
Saeid RahmaniComputer Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11155-1639, Tehran, Iran.
Ali Sharifi-ZarchiComputer Engineering Department, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 11155-1639, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

qPCR is still the gold standard for gene expression quantification. However, its accuracy is highly dependent on the normalization procedure. The conventional method involves using the geometric mean of multiple study-specific reference genes (RGs) expression for cross-sample normalization. While research on selecting stably expressed RGs is extensive, scant literature exists regarding the optimal approach for aggregating multiple RGs into a unified RG. In this paper, we introduce a family of scale-invariant functions as an alternative to the geometric mean aggregation. Our candidate method (weighted geometric mean minimizing standard deviation) demonstrated significantly better results compared to other proposed methods. We provide theoretical and experimental support for this finding using real data from solid tumors and liquid biopsies. Moreover, the closed form and regression-based solution enable efficient computation and straightforward adoption on various platforms. All the proposed methods have been implemented within an easy-to-use R package with graphics processing unit (GPU) acceleration.

Indexed as

Biocomputational methodData processing in systems biologyExpression study

Identifiers

PMID37829204
PMCPMC10565776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.