ArticleMicrosystems & nanoengineering2023
Towards smart scanning probe lithography: a framework accelerating nano-fabrication process with in-situ characterization via machine learning.
Article in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Desktop Fabrication of Plasmonic Nanoantennas with 10 nm Precision Using Field-Emission Scanning Probe Lithography.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Advancing nanolithography: a comprehensive review of materials for local anodic oxidation with AFM.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2026Review
- Generation and Tuning of Semiconductor Electronic and Functional Properties through Electrochemical Patterning.Accounts of materials research · 2025Article
- Interference Field Control for High-Uniformity Nanopatterning: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scanning probe lithography (SPL) is a promising technology to fabricate high-resolution, customized and cost-effective features at the nanoscale. However, the quality of nano-fabrication, particularly the critical dimension, is significantly influenced by various SPL fabrication techniques and their corresponding process parameters. Meanwhile, the identification and measurement of nano-fabrication features are very time-consuming and subjective. To tackle these challenges, we propose a novel framework for process parameter optimization and feature segmentation of SPL via machine learning (ML). Different from traditional SPL techniques that rely on manual labeling-based experimental methods, the proposed framework intelligently extracts reliable and global information for statistical analysis to fine-tune and optimize process parameters. Based on the proposed framework, we realized the processing of smaller critical dimensions through the optimization of process parameters, and performed direct-write nano-lithography on a large scale. Furthermore, data-driven feature extraction and analysis could potentially provide guidance for other characterization methods and fabrication quality optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.