ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction and validation of a prognostic model for children with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Nomogram predicts in-hospital mortality in patients with emergency gastrointestinal bleeding: A multicenter retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The future of critical care: AI-powered mortality prediction for acute variceal gastrointestinal bleeding and acute non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting the gastrointestinal bleeding of HBV-related acute-on-chronic liver failure based on machine learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing the Adequacy of a Prediction Model.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common life-threatening clinical emergency with a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to develop a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in patients with UGIB. We performed a post hoc analysis of a publicly available retrospective clinical data. A total of 360 patients with UGIB were included in this study. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression was used to screen predictors and a restricted cubic spline function was used to investigate the assumption of linear relationships between continuous predictors and the risk of in-hospital mortality. Backward stepwise selection with the Akaike information criterion was used to identify variables for the best prediction model. A nomogram was developed based on the results of the best prediction model. The receiver operating characteristic curve, GiViTI calibration plot, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. The optimal prediction model consisting of 4 predictors: red cell distribution width (odds ratio [OR] = 8.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.77-89.10), platelet count (OR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.99-1.00), pulse rate (OR = 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), and SpO2 (OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.86-0.96). The nomogram model had good discrimination (area under the curve = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.95), calibration, and clinical usefulness. In this study, we developed a nomogram model for predicting death during hospitalization in patients with UGIB based on blood biomarkers and baseline vital signs at the time of admission. The model has good performance, allowing rapid risk stratification of patients with UGIB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.