Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37828593›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Nine de Graaf, Anouk M L H Emmen, Marco Ramera, Bergthor Björnsson, Ugo Boggi, Caro L Bruna, Olivier R Busch, Freek Daams, Giovanni Ferrari, Sebastiaan Festen and 19 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06981273 (SPAIN Trial Comparing Open vs Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06981273 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

SPAIN Trial Comparing Open vs Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital del MarRan2025 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsPancreas NeoplasmsArmsRobotic pancreatoduodenectomy, open pancreatoduodenectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Nine de GraafDepartment of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy. n.degraaf@amsterdamUMC.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7058-4131
Anouk M L H EmmenDepartment of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
Marco RameraDepartment of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
Bergthor BjörnssonDepartment of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Ugo BoggiDepartment of Surgery, Universitá Di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Caro L BrunaDepartment of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
Olivier R BuschDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Freek DaamsDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Giovanni FerrariDepartment of Surgery, Niguarda Ca'Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Sebastiaan FestenCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jony van HilstDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mathieu D'HondtDepartment of Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Benedetto IelpoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Tobias KeckDepartment of Surgery, UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Igor E KhatkovDepartment of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Daan J LipsDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Misha D P LuyerDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
J Sven D MieogDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Luca MorelliGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
I Quintus MolenaarDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Hjalmar C van SantvoortDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Mirjam A G SprangersDepartment of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Clarissa FerrariDepartment of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy.
Johannes BerkhofDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Patrick MaisonneuveDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Mohammad Abu Hilal *Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy. abuhilal9@gmail.com.
Marc G Besselink *Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. m.g.besselink@amsterdamUMC.nl.
European Consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and the potential shorter time to functional recovery needs to be confirmed. To guide safe implementation of MIPD, large-scale international randomized trials comparing MIPD and OPD in experienced high-volume centers are needed. We hypothesize that MIPD is non-inferior in terms of overall complications, but superior regarding time to functional recovery, as compared to OPD. METHODS/

designThe DIPLOMA-2 trial is an international randomized controlled, patient-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 14 high-volume pancreatic centers in Europe with a minimum annual volume of 30 MIPD and 30 OPD. A total of 288 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for pre-malignant and malignant disease, eligible for both open and minimally invasive approach, are randomly allocated for MIPD or OPD in a 2:1 ratio. Centers perform either laparoscopic or robot-assisted MIPD based on their surgical expertise. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), measuring all complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 2.5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected difference of the mean CCI® score of 0 points between MIPD and OPD, and a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 points. The main secondary outcome is time to functional recovery, which will be analyzed for superiority. Other secondary outcomes include post-operative 90-day Fitbit™ measured activity, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery, surgeon-reported outcomes), oncological findings in case of malignancy (e.g., R0-resection rate, time to adjuvant treatment, survival), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications), healthcare resource utilization (length of stay, readmissions, intensive care stay), quality of life, and costs. Postoperative follow-up is up to 36 months. DISCUSSION: The DIPLOMA-2 trial aims to establish the safety of MIPD as the new standard of care for this selected patient population undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in high-volume centers, ultimately aiming for superior patient recovery.

trial registrationISRCTN27483786. Registered on August 2, 2023.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyPancreatic NeoplasmsEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPancreasPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesLaparoscopicMinimally invasivePancreatic cancerPancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPancreatic surgeryPancreatoduodenectomyPeri-ampullary cancerRobot-assistedWhipple

Identifiers

PMID37828593
PMCPMC10571285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.