ArticleTrials2023
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06981273 (SPAIN Trial Comparing Open vs Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SPAIN Trial Comparing Open vs Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Minimally Invasive vs. Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Does robotic pancreatoduodenectomy reduce the incidence of clinically relevant pancreatic fistula? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Minimal Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Metanalysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Minimal Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Metanalysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Perioperative outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (SPAIN Trial): protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial assessing safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Enhancing the Workflow of Full Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Counterclockwise Step-by-Step Approach to Resection and Reconstruction.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Independent risk factors for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula after robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: the protective role of the modified Blumgart pancreatojejunostomy in a single surgeon retrospective cohort of 220 cases.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Cost-analysis of Implementing Robot-assisted Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Single-institution experience of 500 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies: case-matched outcomes of the da Vinci Xi robotic versus open procedures.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Evaluation of safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (SWARS study): a study protocol for a multi-center randomized phase-2 trial.BMC surgery · 2026Article
- Inflammation and fibrosis at pancreatic resection margin and their role in post-operative pancreatic fistula development after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a pilot study from a single institution.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- Article
- Observational
- Managing a Replaced Right Hepatic Artery During Robot-Assisted Pancreatoduodenectomy in Practical Steps.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection for Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Updates, Trends, and Future Considerations.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Approaches in treating infiltrative common bile duct cancer: the potential of robotic hepatopancreatoduodenectomy.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: The Robotic Evolution-Transforming Pancreatic Surgery.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMinimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and the potential shorter time to functional recovery needs to be confirmed. To guide safe implementation of MIPD, large-scale international randomized trials comparing MIPD and OPD in experienced high-volume centers are needed. We hypothesize that MIPD is non-inferior in terms of overall complications, but superior regarding time to functional recovery, as compared to OPD. METHODS/
designThe DIPLOMA-2 trial is an international randomized controlled, patient-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 14 high-volume pancreatic centers in Europe with a minimum annual volume of 30 MIPD and 30 OPD. A total of 288 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for pre-malignant and malignant disease, eligible for both open and minimally invasive approach, are randomly allocated for MIPD or OPD in a 2:1 ratio. Centers perform either laparoscopic or robot-assisted MIPD based on their surgical expertise. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), measuring all complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 2.5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected difference of the mean CCI® score of 0 points between MIPD and OPD, and a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 points. The main secondary outcome is time to functional recovery, which will be analyzed for superiority. Other secondary outcomes include post-operative 90-day Fitbit™ measured activity, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery, surgeon-reported outcomes), oncological findings in case of malignancy (e.g., R0-resection rate, time to adjuvant treatment, survival), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications), healthcare resource utilization (length of stay, readmissions, intensive care stay), quality of life, and costs. Postoperative follow-up is up to 36 months. DISCUSSION: The DIPLOMA-2 trial aims to establish the safety of MIPD as the new standard of care for this selected patient population undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in high-volume centers, ultimately aiming for superior patient recovery.
trial registrationISRCTN27483786. Registered on August 2, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.