Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37828547›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2023

Mega-dose sodium ascorbate: a pilot, single-dose, physiological effect, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

Fumitaka Yanase, Sofia Spano, Akinori Maeda, Anis Chaba, Thummaporn Naorungroj, Connie Pei Chen Ow, Yugeesh R Lankadeva, Clive N May, Ashenafi H Betrie, Darius J R Lane and 3 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An in-vitro study to characterise analytical interference caused by sodium ascorbate with point-of-care measurement of lactate and glucose.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Unravelling the paradox of vitamin C research in sepsis.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  16. Honouring Rinaldo Bellomo's tour de force in sepsis research.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Rinaldo Bellomo: A clinician with a passion for preclinical research.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fumitaka YanaseDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sofia SpanoDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Akinori MaedaDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anis ChabaDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Thummaporn NaorungrojDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Connie Pei Chen OwThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Yugeesh R LankadevaThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Clive N MayThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ashenafi H BetrieThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Darius J R LaneThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Glenn M EastwoodDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mark P PlummerDepartment of Intensive Care, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoDepartment of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Rinaldo.bellomo@austin.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMega-dose sodium ascorbate (NaAscorbate) appears beneficial in experimental sepsis. However, its physiological effects in patients with septic shock are unknown.

methodsWe conducted a pilot, single-dose, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. We enrolled patients with septic shock within 24 h of diagnosis. We randomly assigned them to receive a single mega-dose of NaAscorbate (30 g over 1 h followed by 30 g over 5 h) or placebo (vehicle). The primary outcome was the total 24 h urine output (UO) from the beginning of the study treatment. Secondary outcomes included the time course of the progressive cumulative UO, vasopressor dose, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score.

resultsWe enrolled 30 patients (15 patients in each arm). The mean (95% confidence interval) total 24-h UO was 2056 (1520-2593) ml with placebo and 2948 (2181-3715) ml with NaAscorbate (mean difference 891.5, 95% confidence interval [- 2.1 to 1785.2], P = 0.051). Moreover, the progressive cumulative UO was greater over time on linear mixed modelling with NaAscorbate (P < 0.001). Vasopressor dose and SOFA score changes over time showed faster reductions with NaAscorbate (P < 0.001 and P = 0.042). The sodium level, however, increased more over time with NaAscorbate (P < 0.001). There was no statistical difference in other clinical outcomes.

conclusionIn patients with septic shock, mega-dose NaAscorbate did not significantly increase cumulative 24-h UO. However, it induced a significantly greater increase in UO and a greater reduction in vasopressor dose and SOFA score over time. One episode of hypernatremia and one of hemolysis were observed in the NaAscorbate group. These findings support further cautious investigation of this novel intervention. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN12620000651987), Date registered June/5/2020.

Indexed as

SepsisShock, SepticAscorbic AcidAustraliaDouble-Blind MethodHumansVasoconstrictor AgentsAscorbic AcidVasoconstrictor AgentsSepsisSeptic shockSequential organ failure scoreSodium ascorbateVasopressorsVitamin C

Identifiers

PMID37828547
PMCPMC10571252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.