Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37828546›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2023

Participant attention on the intervention target during repetitive passive movement improved spinal reciprocal inhibition enhancement and joint movement function.

Ryo Hirabayashi, Mutsuaki Edama, Mai Takeda, Yuki Yamada, Hirotake Yokota, Chie Sekine, Hideaki Onishi

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryo HirabayashiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, , Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan. hirabayashi@nuhw.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9698-9276
Mutsuaki EdamaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, , Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Mai TakedaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, , Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Yuki YamadaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, , Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Hirotake YokotaInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, , Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Chie SekineInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, , Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Hideaki OnishiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, 1398 Shimami-cho, Kita-ku, , Niigata-shi, Niigata, 950-3198, Japan.
Niigata University of Health and Welfare · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20K19464Niigata University of Health and Welfare R03C45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the participant's attention target during repetitive passive movement (RPM) intervention on reciprocal inhibition (RI) and joint movement function. Twenty healthy adults participated in two experiments involving four attention conditions [control (forward attention with no RPM), forward attention (during RPM), monitor attention (monitor counting task during RPM), ankle joint attention (ankle movement counting task during RPM)] during 10-min RPM interventions on the ankle joint. Counting tasks were included to ensure the participant's attention remained on the target during the intervention. In Experiment 1, RI was measured before, immediately after, and 5, 10, 15, 20, and 30 min after the RPM intervention. In Experiment 2, we evaluated ankle joint movement function at the same time points before and after RPM intervention. The maximum ankle dorsiflexion movement (from 30° plantar flexion to 10° dorsiflexion) was measured, reflecting RI. In Experiment 1, the RI function reciprocal Ia inhibition was enhanced for 10 min after RPM under all attention conditions (excluding the control condition. D1 inhibition was enhanced for 20 min after RPM in the forward and monitor attention conditions and 30 min after RPM in the ankle joint attention condition. In Experiment 2, the joint movement function decreased under the forward and monitor attention conditions but improved under the ankle joint attention condition. This study is the first to demonstrate that the participant's attention target affected the intervention effect of the RI enhancement method, which has implications for improving the intervention effect of rehabilitation.

Indexed as

AnkleMovementAdultAnkle JointHumansMuscle, SkeletalRange of Motion, ArticularElectrical stimulationH-reflexReciprocal inhibitionRehabilitationRepetitive passive movement

Identifiers

PMID37828546
PMCPMC10571356
OpenAlexW4387579893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.