Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37828514›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023

Vertebral bone quality different in magnetic resonance imaging parameters.

Xiang-Ge Liu, Xin Chen, Biao Chen, Pei-Jie Liang, Han-Hui Liu, Meiqi Fu

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Estimating lumbar bone mineral density from conventional MRI and radiographs with deep learning in spine patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiang-Ge LiuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital, Fosun Group, Foshan, 528000, China.
Xin ChenDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital, Fosun Group, Foshan, 528000, China.
Biao ChenDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital, Fosun Group, Foshan, 528000, China.
Pei-Jie LiangDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital, Fosun Group, Foshan, 528000, China.
Han-Hui LiuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital, Fosun Group, Foshan, 528000, China.
Meiqi FuDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital, Fosun Group, Foshan, 528000, China. fumeiqi2005@126.com.
Foshan Hospital of TCM · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis was a single-center retrospective study that aimed to measure the vertebral bone quality (VBQ) in people of all ages and compare changes in VBQ across ages. Differences in VBQ under various MRI parameters were compared.

methodsWe first screened patients without underlying disease and no history of fractures who underwent lumbar MRI in our center in the past four years. Over the span of 10 years, 200 patients (100 males and 100 females) were randomly recruited into each cohort to undergo 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI scans. Subsequently, we tabulated the number of patients admitted to our hospital with OVCF over the past four years. There were 30 healthy adults under 4 times of MRI scans in different parameters to determine the differentiation of VBQ. The 30 healthy adults were recruited to validate the differentiation of VBQ under various parameters.

resultsA total of 2400 patients without OVCF and 405 patients with OVCF were enrolled. The VBQ value of 1.5 T was significantly higher compared with that of 3.0 T (2.769 ± 0.494 > 2.199 ± 0.432, P < 0.0001). VBQ of 43.31 kHz in 1.5 T was significantly lower than that of 35.36 kHz (2.447 ± 0.350 < 2.632 ± 0.280, P < 0.05). The differentiation of VBQ in 1.5 T and 3.0 T was validated using results of healthy adults.

conclusionsVBQ is an effective tool for differentiating patients with OVCF and can be used as a primary screening tool for osteoporosis. However, VBQ is significantly affected by magnetic field intensity and bandwidth and cannot achieve its universality as it originally proposed.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionOsteoporotic FracturesSpinal FracturesFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRetrospective StudiesFractureMagnetic resonance imagingOsteoporosisOsteoporotic vertebral compressionSpineVBQVertebral bone quality

Identifiers

PMID37828514
PMCPMC10571331
OpenAlexW4387569487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.