Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37828498›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2023

The landscape of cell-free mitochondrial DNA in liquid biopsy for cancer detection.

Ymke van der Pol, Norbert Moldovan, Jip Ramaker, Sanne Bootsma, Kristiaan J Lenos, Louis Vermeulen, Shahneen Sandhu, Idris Bahce, D Michiel Pegtel, Stephen Q Wong and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ymke van der PolAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Norbert MoldovanAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jip RamakerAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sanne BootsmaAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Kristiaan J LenosAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Louis VermeulenAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Shahneen SandhuPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Idris BahceAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pulmonology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
D Michiel PegtelAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Stephen Q WongPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah-Jane Dawson *Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. Sarah-Jane.Dawson@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-0374
Dineika Chandrananda *Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. Dineika.Chandrananda@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8834-9500
Florent Mouliere *Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. florent.mouliere@cruk.manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7043-0514
Dutch Cancer Society · NLThe University of Melbourne · AUAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting methods to detect tumor signal in liquid biopsy have focused on the analysis of nuclear cell-free DNA (cfDNA). However, non-nuclear cfDNA and in particular mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been understudied. We hypothesize that an increase in mtDNA in plasma could reflect the presence of cancer, and that leveraging cell-free mtDNA could enhance cancer detection.

resultsWe survey 203 healthy and 664 cancer plasma samples from three collection centers covering 12 cancer types with whole genome sequencing to catalogue the plasma mtDNA fraction. The mtDNA fraction is increased in individuals with cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal, liver, pancreatic, or prostate cancer, in comparison to that in healthy individuals. We detect almost no increase of mtDNA fraction in individuals with other cancer types. The mtDNA fraction in plasma correlates with the cfDNA tumor fraction as determined by somatic mutations and/or copy number aberrations. However, the mtDNA fraction is also elevated in a fraction of patients without an apparent increase in tumor-derived cfDNA. A predictive model integrating mtDNA and copy number analysis increases the area under the curve (AUC) from 0.73 when using copy number alterations alone to an AUC of 0.81.

conclusionsThe mtDNA signal retrieved by whole genome sequencing has the potential to boost the detection of cancer when combined with other tumor-derived signals in liquid biopsies.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNA, MitochondrialHumansLiquid BiopsyMaleMitochondriaBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, MitochondrialCancerCell-free DNALiquid biopsyMitochondrial DNASequencing

Identifiers

PMID37828498
PMCPMC10571306
OpenAlexW4387578542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.