ArticleBMC cancer2023
Is radical radiotherapy with/without surgery an effective treatment in the lymphoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary gland？.
Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Case Report: Epidemiology, clinical features and progress in disease management for lymphoepithelial carcinoma of salivary glands: report of 3 cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited information of radical radiotherapy (RT) on lymphoepithelial carcinoma of salivary gland (LECSG) regarding to the rarity of the disease. We conducted this retrospective study that evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of radical RT with/without surgery in LECSG.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients that were pathologically diagnosed of LECSG and had definite or suspicious residual disease. The prescribed dose given to P-GTV and/or P-GTV-LN was 66 to 70.4 Gy. The clinical target volume (CTV) involved ipsilateral salivary gland and corresponding lymph node drainage area.
resultsA total of 56 patients were included. With a median follow-up of 60 months (range: 8 to 151 months), the 1-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 94.6%, 84.7% and 84.7%; locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) rates were 98.2%, 87.4% and 87.4%; distance metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates were 94.6%, 86.7% and 86.7%; and overall survival (OS) rates were 98.2%, 92.4% and 89.0%, respectively. A total of 7 patients without surgery were included. All patients were alive and only one patient experienced failure of distant metastasis four months after RT. The results of univariate analysis showed that compared with N stage, the number of positive lymph nodes (2 positive lymph nodes) was better prognostic predictor especially in PFS. There were no treatment-related deaths and most toxicities of RT were mild.
conclusionsRadical RT with/without surgery in LECSG for definite or suspicious residual disease is feasibility and efficacy. Most toxicities of RT were mild due to the target volume involved ipsilateral area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.