Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37828469›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Psychological safety and accountability in longitudinal integrated clerkships: a dual institution qualitative study.

Robyn A Latessa, Shelley L Galvin, Robert A Swendiman, Joshua Onyango, Bayla Ostrach, Amy C Edmondson, Scott A Davis, David A Hirsh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Robyn A LatessaDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4723-1805
Shelley L GalvinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7839-5212
Robert A SwendimanDepartment of Pediatric General Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1592-0120
Joshua OnyangoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Bayla OstrachUniversity of North Carolina Health Sciences at Mountain Area Health Education Center, Asheville, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2803-3747
Amy C EdmondsonHarvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4409-913X
Scott A DavisDivision of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Asheville, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-9850
David A HirshHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. david_hirsh@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0304-4047
Boston University · USCambridge Health Alliance · USMountain Area Health Education Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Asheville · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Utah · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological safety and accountability are frameworks to describe relationships in the workplace. Psychological safety is a shared belief by members of a team that it is safe to take interpersonal risks. Accountability refers to being challenged and expected to meet expectations and goals. Psychological safety and accountability are supported by relational trust. Relational continuity is the educational construct underpinning longitudinal integrated clerkships. The workplace constructs of psychological safety and accountability may offer lenses to understand students' educational experiences in longitudinal integrated clerkships.

methodsWe performed a qualitative study of 9 years of longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates from two regionally diverse programs-at Harvard Medical School and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine. We used deductive content analysis to characterize psychological safety and accountability from semi-structured interviews of longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates.

resultsAnalysis of 20 graduates' interview transcripts reached saturation. We identified 109 discrete excerpts describing psychological safety, accountability, or both. Excerpts with high psychological safety described trusting relationships and safe learning spaces. Low psychological safety included fear and frustration and perceptions of stressful learning environments. Excerpts characterizing high accountability involved increased learning and responsibility toward patients. Low accountability included students not feeling challenged. Graduates' descriptions with both high psychological safety and high accountability characterized optimized learning and performance.

conclusionsThis study used the workplace-based frameworks of psychological safety and accountability to explore qualitatively longitudinal integrated clerkship graduates' experiences as students. Graduates described high and low psychological safety and accountability. Graduates' descriptions of high psychological safety and accountability involved positive learning experiences and responsibility toward patients. The relational lenses of psychological safety and accountability may inform faculty development and future educational research in clinical medical education.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipStudents, MedicalEducational StatusHumansLearningQualitative ResearchSocial ResponsibilityStudentsWorkplaceAccountabilityClinical educationLongitudinal integrated clerkshipsMedical student-teacher relationshipPreceptorPsychological safetyTrust

Identifiers

PMID37828469
PMCPMC10571297
OpenAlexW4387567895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.