Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37828300›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2024

Influence of various factors on the legal outcome of cases of child abuse-experiences gathered at an interdisciplinary forensic examination center in Vienna, Austria.

Maria Kletečka-Pulker, Klara Doppler, Sabine Völkl-Kernstock, Laura Fischer, Magdalena Eitenberger, Mark Mussner, Sophie Klomfar, Eva Anna Mora-Theuer, Chryssa Grylli, Atanas G Atanasov and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Kletečka-PulkerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety (LBI-DHPS), Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Währinger Straße 104/10, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
Klara DopplerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety (LBI-DHPS), Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Währinger Straße 104/10, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
Sabine Völkl-KernstockLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety (LBI-DHPS), Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Währinger Straße 104/10, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
Laura FischerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety (LBI-DHPS), Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Währinger Straße 104/10, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
Magdalena EitenbergerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety (LBI-DHPS), Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Währinger Straße 104/10, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
Mark MussnerInstitute for Ethics and Law in Medicine, University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 2-4, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Sophie KlomfarLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety (LBI-DHPS), Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Währinger Straße 104/10, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
Eva Anna Mora-TheuerDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Chryssa GrylliDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Atanas G AtanasovLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Digital Health and Patient Safety (LBI-DHPS), Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft, Währinger Straße 104/10, 1180, Vienna, Austria.
Susanne Greber-PlatzerDivision of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria. susanne.greber-platzer@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3706-8370
Ludwig Boltzmann Gesellschaft · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveTo improve the currently low conviction rate in cases of child abuse a forensic examination center for children and adolescents (FOKUS) was established in Vienna, Austria. Besides a state of the art treatment combined with forensic documentation, one of FOKUS' key goals is to identify potential areas for improvements within the process legal proceedings in cases of child abuse through constant scientific monitoring. The accompanying study at hand includes all patients referred to FOKUS within a two year timeframe (n = 233), monitoring their progression from first contact with the medical professionals from FOKUS to the end of criminal proceedings. A detailed analysis of case files was performed in those cases that were reported to the legal authorities by the clinicians of FOKUS (n = 87). Aim of the study is to investigate which factors contribute to the initiation of legal proceedings and a successful conviction.

resultsMultivariate logistic regression analyses showed that main proceedings were opened more often in cases where the offender was an adult (p < 0.001) or admitted his guilt (p < 0.001) and if digital traces were available (p = 0.001) or trial support (p = 0.024) present. Furthermore, the combined occurrence of medical documentation and victim disclosure was related to a higher probability of opening main trials.

conclusionThese findings underline how challenging the successful persecution of an offender in cases of child abuse is.

Indexed as

Child AbuseChild Abuse, SexualAdolescentAdultAustriaChildDisclosureDocumentationHumansChild abuseChild maltreatmentCourt filesForensic examination centersLegal proceedings

Identifiers

PMID37828300
PMCPMC10772007
OpenAlexW4387581151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.