ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2024
Sacrum and Coccyx Shape Changes During Pregnancy and After Delivery.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sacrum and Coccyx Shape Changes During Pregnancy and After Delivery.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Remodeling of the sacrum and coccyx to accommodate pregnancy and delivery has been hypothesized but not directly quantified. This study aimed to quantify the remodeling of the sacrum and coccyx by comparing midsagittal lengths, angles, curvature, and shape between nulliparous, pregnant, and parous women using both 2 and 3 dimensional measures. Ninety pelvic magnetic resonance images of the pelvis were retrospectively collected and segmented. Twelve length, angle, and curvature measurements were made using definitions from previous literature on the midsagittal plane to define the sacrum, coccyx, and combined sacrum-coccyx shape. These measures were followed by a statistical shape analysis, which returned modes of variation and principal component scores. A separate MANCOVA analysis was conducted for both the 2D and 3D measures. The 2D and 3D analyses agreed that pregnant women had a significantly straighter coccyx and combined sacrum/coccyx than nulliparous (9.1% and 5.6%, respectively) and parous (7.5% and 2.7%, respectively) subjects. All comparisons showed that, on average, a pregnant woman's sacrum and coccyx were significantly straighter than their nulliparous counterparts. Then after delivery, the sacrum/coccyx returned, but not completely back to a more curved configuration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37828266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.