Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37828116›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Scientific facts improve cannabis perception and public opinion: results from Sinaloa, México.

Josué Camberos-Barraza, Juan F Osuna-Ramos, Ángel R Rábago-Monzón, Luis F Quiñonez-Angulo, Héctor R González-Peña, Alan A Pérez-Ramos, Alejandro Camacho-Zamora, Héctor López-Lazcano, Marco A Valdez-Flores, Carla E Angulo-Rojo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Hemp Extract (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Josué Camberos-Barraza *Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Juan F Osuna-Ramos *Faculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Ángel R Rábago-MonzónFaculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Luis F Quiñonez-AnguloFaculty of Economic and Social Sciences, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Héctor R González-Peña"Sinaloa Verde de a Devis" Collective, Culiacán, Mexico.
Alan A Pérez-Ramos"Sinaloa Verde de a Devis" Collective, Culiacán, Mexico.
Alejandro Camacho-ZamoraFaculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Héctor López-LazcanoFaculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Marco A Valdez-FloresFaculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Carla E Angulo-RojoFaculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Alma M Guadrón-LlanosFaculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Verónica J Picos-CárdenasFaculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Claudia D Norzagaray-ValenzuelaFaculty of Biology, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
Alberto K De la Herrán-AritaFaculty of Medicine, Autonomous University of Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico. alberto.kousuke@uas.edu.mx.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis, the most prevalent drug in Latin America, has long been associated with the state of Sinaloa, Mexico, known for its cultivation and distribution. Despite increasing global acceptance, cannabis use remains stigmatized in Mexican society, driven by perceptions of it as a highly psychoactive and addictive substance lacking medicinal or industrial value. This study investigates the impact of scientific information on societal perceptions of cannabis in Sinaloa. A large convenience sample of 3162 individuals from Sinaloa participated in this research, responding to a questionnaire on cannabis consumption and attitudes. Participants were then subjected to an intervention consisting of an informative briefing based on the documents "Using Evidence to Talk About Cannabis" and "State of the Evidence: cannabis use and regulation" by the International Centre for Science in Drug Policy. After the intervention, participants' attitudes were immediately reevaluated through the same questionnaire, allowing for a comparison of pre- and post-intervention responses. The results indicate that the intervention (providing scientific information) significantly influenced attitudes toward cannabis, with education and age playing prominent roles in its effectiveness. Notably, the intervention fostered more positive or more neutral attitudes, potentially reducing stigma and promoting a better-informed perspective on cannabis. This study highlights the pivotal role of evidence in shaping informed citizens' views, while underscoring the importance of countering misinformation for societal progress. These findings have significant implications for forthcoming cannabis policy modifications in Mexico, emphasizing the necessity of engaging knowledgeable individuals in policy decisions to address the violence and inequalities associated with the illicit drug trade, particularly in Sinaloa.

Indexed as

CannabisHallucinogensAttitudeCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsHumansMexicoPerceptionPublic OpinionCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsHallucinogens

Identifiers

PMID37828116
PMCPMC10570375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.