Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37827864›Full record

ReviewTrends in immunology2023

IL-2-driven CD8

Veronika Niederlova, Oksana Tsyklauri, Marek Kovar, Ondrej Stepanek

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Mechanisms and Immune Regulation in Prostate Cancer: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Programmed Cell Death Protein 1-Interleukin-2 Bispecific Agents for Cancer Therapy.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel Bioactive Multifunctional Polyphenols: A Chemo-Enzymatic Approach.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Impact of rice wine-steamedFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Veronika NiederlovaLaboratory of Adaptive Immunity, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Oksana TsyklauriLaboratory of Adaptive Immunity, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marek KovarLaboratory of Tumor Immunology, Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondrej StepanekLaboratory of Adaptive Immunity, Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: ondrej.stepanek@img.cas.cz.
Czech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Molecular Genetics · CZ

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 166538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The therapeutic potential of interleukin (IL)-2 in cancer treatment has been known for decades, yet its widespread adoption in clinical practice remains limited. Recently, chimeric proteins of an anti-PD-1 antibody and suboptimal IL-2 variants were shown to stimulate potent antitumor and antiviral immunity by inducing unique effector CD8

Indexed as

CD8-Positive T-LymphocytesInterleukin-2AnimalsImmunotherapyMicePhenotypeT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryInterleukin-2cancercytotoxic T cellsIL-2immunotherapyPD-1regulatory T cell

Identifiers

PMID37827864
PMCPMC7615502
OpenAlexW4387477036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.