Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37827745›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Identifying and prioritising future interventions with stakeholders to improve paediatric urgent care pathways in Scotland, UK: a mixed-methods study.

Emma King, Emma France, Cari Malcolm, Simita Kumar, Smita Dick, Richard G Kyle, Philip Wilson, Lorna Aucott, Stephen Turner, Pat Hoddinott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emma KingNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK emma.king@stir.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3611-9647
Emma FranceNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Cari MalcolmSchool of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Simita KumarScreening and Immunisation, Public Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Smita DickChild Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Richard G KyleAcademy of Nursing, Department of Health and Care Professions, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Philip WilsonInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4123-8248
Lorna AucottCentre for Randomised Healthcare Trials, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Stephen TurnerWomen and Children Division NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8393-5060
Pat HoddinottNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4372-9681

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HIPS/18/09Chief Scientist Office HSRU1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify and prioritise interventions, from the perspectives of parents and health professionals, which may be alternatives to current unscheduled paediatric urgent care pathways.

designFLAMINGO (FLow of AdMissions in chIldren and youNG peOple) is a sequential mixed-methods study, with public and patient involvement (PPI) throughout. Data linkage for urgent admissions and three referral sources: emergency department, out of hours service and general practice, was followed by qualitative interviews with parents and professionals. Findings were presented and discussed at a stakeholder intervention prioritisation event.

settingNational Health Service in Scotland, UK.

participantsQuantitative data: children with urgent medical admission to hospital from 2015 to 2017. Qualitative interviews: parents and health professionals with experiences of urgent short stay hospital admissions of children. PPI engagement was conducted with nine parent-toddler groups and a university-based PPI advisory group. Stakeholder event: parents, health professionals and representatives from Scottish Government, academia, charities and PPI attended.

resultsData for 171 039 admissions which included 92 229 short stay admissions were analysed and 48 health professionals and 21 parents were interviewed. The stakeholder event included 7 parents, 12 health professionals and 28 other stakeholders. Analysis and synthesis of all data identified seven interventions which were prioritised at the stakeholder event: (1) addressing gaps in acute paediatric skills of health professionals working in community settings; (2) assessment and observation of acutely unwell children in community settings; (3) creation of holistic children's 'hubs'; (4) adoption of 'hospital at home' models; and three specialised care pathways for subgroups of children; (5) convulsions; (6) being aged <2 years old; and (7) wheeze/bronchiolitis. Stakeholders prioritised interventions 1, 2 and 3; these could be combined into a whole population intervention. Barriers to progressing these include resources, staffing and rurality.

conclusionsHealth professionals and families want future interventions that are patient-centred, community-based and aligned to outcomes that matter to them.

Indexed as

Critical PathwaysState MedicineAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHealth PersonnelHumansParentsScotlandACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEPaediatric A&E and ambulatory carePatient ParticipationQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID37827745
PMCPMC10582902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.