Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37827744›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Patient-led home-based follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer: the protocol of the prospective, multicentre FUTURE-primary implementation study.

Kelly Raquel Voigt, Lissa Wullaert, Diederik J Höppener, Jennifer M J Schreinemakers, Pascal G Doornebosch, Maria Verseveld, Koen Peeters, Cornelis Verhoef, Olga Husson, Dirk Grünhagen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05656326 (Follow-up After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05656326 active not recruitingnot on this map

Follow-up After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: the Prospective, Multicentre FUTURE-primary Implementation Study

TypeobservationalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2021 to 2029Enrolled200ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Quality of Life
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quality of life assessment for colorectal cancer follow-up: A latent profile analysis of EORTC measures.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The association of cognitive coping style with patient preferences in a patient-led follow-up study among colorectal cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Assessing patients' needs in the follow-up after treatment for colorectal cancer-a mixed-method study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kelly Raquel VoigtDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4592-9409
Lissa WullaertDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diederik J HöppenerDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jennifer M J SchreinemakersDepartment of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Pascal G DoorneboschDepartment of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan den IJssel, The Netherlands.
Maria VerseveldDepartment of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Koen PeetersDepartment of Surgery, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Olga HussonDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk GrünhagenDepartment of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands d.grunhagen@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common type of cancer in the Netherlands. Approximately 90% of patients can be treated with surgery, which is considered potentially curative. Postoperative surveillance during the first 5 years after surgery pursues to detect metastases in an early, asymptomatic and treatable stage. Multiple large randomised controlled trials have failed to show any (cancer-specific) survival benefit of intensive postoperative surveillance compared with a minimalistic approach in patients with CRC. This raises the question whether an (intensive) in-hospital postoperative surveillance strategy is still warranted from both a patient well-being and societal perspective. A more modern, home-based surveillance strategy could be beneficial in terms of patients' quality of life and healthcare costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The multicentre, prospective FUTURE-primary study implements a patient-led home-based surveillance after curative CRC treatment. Here, patients are involved in the choice regarding three fundamental aspects of their postoperative surveillance. First regarding frequency, patients can opt for additional follow-up moments to the minimal requirement as outlined by the current Dutch national guidelines. Second regarding the setting, both in-hospital or predominantly home-based options are available. And third, concerning patient-doctor communication choices ranging from in-person to video chat, and even silent check-ups. The aim of the FUTURE-primary study is to evaluate if such a patient-led home-based follow-up approach is successful in terms of quality of life, satisfaction and anxiety compared with historic data. A successful implementation of the patient-led aspect will be assessed by the degree in which the additional, optional follow-up moments are actually utilised. Secondary objectives are to evaluate quality of life, anxiety, fear of cancer recurrence and cost-effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was given by the Medical Ethics Review Committee of Erasmus Medical Centre, The Netherlands (2021-0499). Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05656326.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsQuality of LifeCost-Benefit AnalysisFollow-Up StudiesHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsRecurrenceColorectal surgeryPatient-Centered CareQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID37827744
PMCPMC10582858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.