Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37826988›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2023

Prevalence of fentanyl in methamphetamine and cocaine samples collected by community-based drug checking services.

Karla D Wagner, Phillip Fiuty, Kimberly Page, Erin C Tracy, Maryalice Nocera, Colin W Miller, Lina J Tarhuni, Nabarun Dasgupta

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
21.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cocaine-Induced Ocular Toxicity.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Correlates of Rural Naloxone Possession Among People Who Use Drugs: A Multi-State Cross-Sectional Analysis.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karla D WagnerDepartment of Health Behavior, Policy, and Administration Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA. Electronic address: karlawagner@unr.edu.
Phillip FiutyThe Mountain Center, Española, NM 87606, USA. Electronic address: phillip@pfhrsnm.com.
Kimberly PageDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. Electronic address: Pagek@salud.unm.edu.
Erin C TracyInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: ectracy@unc.edu.
Maryalice NoceraInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: mnocera@unc.edu.
Colin W MillerInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: cwm@unc.edu.
Lina J TarhuniDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. Electronic address: LTarhuni@salud.unm.edu.
Nabarun DasguptaInjury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, CB 7505, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Electronic address: nab@unc.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of New Mexico · USNorthern New Mexico College · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

UNM HSC Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001449 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CAMPEN, MATTHEW J, PANDHI, NANCY · 2015 to 2024
$36.9M
Synthesis of Bioactive Small Molecule Building BlocksR35GM118055 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Jeffrey S Johnson · 2016 to 2026
$5.0M
A Multi-Site Mixed Methods Study of Methamphetamine Use in the Mountain WestR01CE003356 · CE · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI PAGE, KIMBERLY, WAGNER, KARLA D. · 2021 to 2023
$1.1M
CDC HHS R01CE003356NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001449NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001449NCIPC CDC HHS R01 CE003356NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118055NIGMS NIH HHS R35GM118055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOverdose deaths involving stimulants and opioids simultaneously have raised the specter of widespread contamination of the stimulant supply with fentanyl.

methodsWe quantified prevalence of fentanyl in street methamphetamine and cocaine, stratified by crystalline texture, analyzing samples sent voluntarily to a public mail-in drug checking service (May 2021-June 2023). Samples from 77 harm reduction programs and clinics originated in 25 US states. Sample donors reported expected drug and physical descriptions. Substances were identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Negative binomial models were used to calculate fentanyl prevalence, adjusting for potential confounders related to sample selection. We also examined if xylazine changed donors' accuracy of detecting fentanyl.

resultsWe analyzed 718 lab-confirmed samples of methamphetamine (64%) and cocaine (36%). The adjusted prevalence of fentanyl was 12.5% (95% CI: 2.2%, 22.9%) in powder methamphetamine and 14.8% (2.3%, 27.2%) in powder cocaine, with notable geographic variation. Crystalline forms of both methamphetamine (Chisq=57, p<0.001) and cocaine (Chisq=18, p<0.001) were less likely to contain fentanyl: less than 1% of crystal methamphetamine (2/276) and no crack cocaine (0/53). Heroin was present in 6.6% of powder cocaine samples. Xylazine reduced donors' ability to detect fentanyl, with correct classification dropping from 92% to 42%.

conclusionsFentanyl was detected primarily in powder forms of methamphetamine and cocaine. Recommended interventions include expanding community-based drug checking, naloxone and fentanyl test strip distribution for people who use stimulants , and supervised drug consumption sites. New strategies to dampen variability in street drug composition are needed to reduce inadvertent fentanyl exposure.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System StimulantsCocaineCrack CocaineDrug OverdoseMethamphetamineAnalgesics, OpioidCommunity Health ServicesFentanylHumansPowdersPrevalenceXylazineAnalgesics, OpioidCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineCrack CocaineFentanylMethamphetaminePowdersXylazineCocaineDrug checkingEpidemiologyFentanylHarm reductionMethamphetamine

Identifiers

PMID37826988
PMCPMC10688611
OpenAlexW4387369645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.