ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023
An investigation of how specimen dimensions affect biaxial mechanical characterizations with CellScale BioTester and constitutive modeling of porcine tricuspid valve leaflets.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Passive intervertebral restraint is different in patients with treatment-resistant chronic nonspecific low back pain: a retrospective cohort study and control comparison.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Article
- Application of Adipose Stem Cells in 3D Nerve Guidance Conduit Prevents Muscle Atrophy and Improves Distal Muscle Compliance in a Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biaxial mechanical characterizations are the accepted approach to determine the mechanical response of many biological soft tissues. Although several computational and experimental studies have examined how experimental factors (e.g., clamped vs. suture mounting) affect the acquired tissue mechanical behavior, little is known about the role of specimen dimensions in data acquisition and the subsequent modeling. In this study, we combined our established mechanical characterization framework with an iterative size-reduction protocol to test the hypothesis that specimen dimensions affect the observed mechanical behavior of biaxial characterizations. Our findings indicated that there were non-significant differences in the peak equibiaxial stretches of tricuspid valve leaflets across four specimen dimensions ranging from 4.5×4.5mm to 9 × 9mm. Further analyses revealed that there were significant differences in the low-tensile modulus of the circumferential tissue direction. These differences resulted in significantly different constitutive model parameters for the Tong-Fung model between different specimen dimensions of the posterior and septal leaflets. Overall, our findings demonstrate that specimen dimensions play an important role in experimental characterizations, but not necessarily in constitutive modeling of soft tissue mechanical behavior during biaxial testing with the commercial CellScale BioTester.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.