Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37826848›Full record

SynthesisObstetrics and gynecology2023

Health Care Disparities in Patients Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: A Systematic Review.

Cecilia K Wieslander, Cara L Grimes, Ethan M Balk, Deslyn T G Hobson, Nancy E Ringel, Tatiana V D Sanses, Ruchira Singh, Monica L Richardson, Lioudmila Lipetskaia, Ankita Gupta and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cecilia K WieslanderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; the Division of Urogynecology & Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York; the Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan; the Division of Urogynecology & Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC; the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, Florida; Occom Health, Newton, Massachusetts; the Division of Urogynecology & Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Cooper Health University, Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey; the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Louisville Health, Louisville, Kentucky; the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, and the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, the Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas; and the Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Cara L Grimes
Ethan M Balk
Deslyn T G Hobson
Nancy E Ringel
Tatiana V D Sanses
Ruchira Singh
Monica L Richardson
Lioudmila Lipetskaia
Ankita Gupta
Amanda B White
Francisco Orejuela
Kate Meriwether
Danielle D Antosh
Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery · US

Funding

University of Maryland Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (UM-OAIC)P30AG028747 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Stephen L. Seliger · 2006 to 2026
$28.9M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore how markers of health care disparity are associated with access to care and outcomes among patients seeking and undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through January 23, 2022. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: The population of interest included patients in the United States who sought or underwent hysterectomy by any approach for benign indications. Health care disparity markers included race, ethnicity, geographic location, insurance status, and others. Outcomes included access to surgery, patient level outcomes, and surgical outcomes. Eligible studies reported multivariable regression analyses that described the independent association between at least one health care disparity risk marker and an outcome. We evaluated direction and strengths of association within studies and consistency across studies. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND

resultsOf 6,499 abstracts screened, 39 studies with a total of 46 multivariable analyses were included. Having a Black racial identity was consistently associated with decreased access to minimally invasive, laparoscopic, robotic, and vaginal hysterectomy. Being of Hispanic ethnicity and having Asian or Pacific Islander racial identities were associated with decreased access to laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy. Black patients were the only racial or ethnic group with an increased association with hysterectomy complications. Medicare insurance was associated with decreased access to laparoscopic hysterectomy, and both Medicaid and Medicare insurance were associated with increased likelihood of hysterectomy complications. Living in the South or Midwest or having less than a college degree education was associated with likelihood of prior hysterectomy.

conclusionStudies suggest that various health care disparity markers are associated with poorer access to less invasive hysterectomy procedures and with poorer outcomes for patients who are undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. Further research is needed to understand and identify the causes of these disparities, and immediate changes to our health care system are needed to improve access and opportunities for patients facing health care disparities. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021234511.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesMedicareAgedEthnicityFemaleHumansHysterectomyHysterectomy, VaginalRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37826848
PMCPMC13667931
OpenAlexW4387567790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.