ArticleJCO precision oncology2023
Computational Advancements in Cancer Combination Therapy Prediction.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combination Strategies with HSP90 Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy: Mechanisms, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The molecular basis of the anticancer effect of statins.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Potentials and future perspectives of multi-target drugs in cancer treatment: the next generation anti-cancer agents.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Given the high attrition rate of de novo drug discovery and limited efficacy of single-agent therapies in cancer treatment, combination therapy prediction through in silico drug repurposing has risen as a time- and cost-effective alternative for identifying novel and potentially efficacious therapies for cancer. The purpose of this review is to provide an introduction to computational methods for cancer combination therapy prediction and to summarize recent studies that implement each of these methods. A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed, focusing on studies published within the past 10 years. Our search included reviews and articles of ongoing and retrospective studies. We prioritized articles with findings that suggest considerations for improving combination therapy prediction methods over providing a meta-analysis of all currently available cancer combination therapy prediction methods. Computational methods used for drug combination therapy prediction in cancer research include networks, regression-based machine learning, classifier machine learning models, and deep learning approaches. Each method class has its own advantages and disadvantages, so careful consideration is needed to determine the most suitable class when designing a combination therapy prediction method. Future directions to improve current combination therapy prediction technology include incorporation of disease pathobiology, drug characteristics, patient multiomics data, and drug-drug interactions to determine maximally efficacious and tolerable drug regimens for cancer. As computational methods improve in their capability to integrate patient, drug, and disease data, more comprehensive models can be developed to more accurately predict safe and efficacious combination drug therapies for cancer and other complex diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.