Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37824797›Full record

ArticleJCO precision oncology2023

Computational Advancements in Cancer Combination Therapy Prediction.

Victoria L Flanary, Jennifer L Fisher, Elizabeth J Wilk, Timothy C Howton, Brittany N Lasseigne

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO precision oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Victoria L FlanaryDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0003-4208-3695
Jennifer L FisherDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Elizabeth J WilkDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-7078-1215
Timothy C HowtonDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Brittany N LasseigneDepartment of Cell, Developmental and Integrative Biology, Heersink School of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.ORCID 0000-0002-1642-8904
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008361 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI YACOUBIAN, TALENE ALENE · 1992 to 2024
$16.8M
Using Common Fund data to inform rare disease preclinical models and prioritize drug repurposingR03OD030604 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LASSEIGNE, BRITTANY NICOLE · 2020 to 2020
$297k
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008361NIH HHS R03 OD030604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the high attrition rate of de novo drug discovery and limited efficacy of single-agent therapies in cancer treatment, combination therapy prediction through in silico drug repurposing has risen as a time- and cost-effective alternative for identifying novel and potentially efficacious therapies for cancer. The purpose of this review is to provide an introduction to computational methods for cancer combination therapy prediction and to summarize recent studies that implement each of these methods. A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed, focusing on studies published within the past 10 years. Our search included reviews and articles of ongoing and retrospective studies. We prioritized articles with findings that suggest considerations for improving combination therapy prediction methods over providing a meta-analysis of all currently available cancer combination therapy prediction methods. Computational methods used for drug combination therapy prediction in cancer research include networks, regression-based machine learning, classifier machine learning models, and deep learning approaches. Each method class has its own advantages and disadvantages, so careful consideration is needed to determine the most suitable class when designing a combination therapy prediction method. Future directions to improve current combination therapy prediction technology include incorporation of disease pathobiology, drug characteristics, patient multiomics data, and drug-drug interactions to determine maximally efficacious and tolerable drug regimens for cancer. As computational methods improve in their capability to integrate patient, drug, and disease data, more comprehensive models can be developed to more accurately predict safe and efficacious combination drug therapies for cancer and other complex diseases.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsDrug DiscoveryHumansMachine LearningMeta-Analysis as TopicRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37824797
PMCPMC12012855
OpenAlexW4387584178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.