Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37824617›Full record

ArticleScience advances2023

Annual mass budget of Antarctic ice shelves from 1997 to 2021.

Benjamin J Davison, Anna E Hogg, Noel Gourmelen, Livia Jakob, Jan Wuite, Thomas Nagler, Chad A Greene, Julia Andreasen, Marcus E Engdahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benjamin J DavisonSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9483-2956
Anna E HoggSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6441-4937
Noel GourmelenSchool of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3346-9289
Livia JakobEarthwave, Codebase, Office L2, 3 Lady Lawson St, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5289-5932
Jan WuiteENVEO IT GmbH, Innsbruck 6020, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-9333-1586
Thomas NaglerENVEO IT GmbH, Innsbruck 6020, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-8469
Chad A GreeneJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6710-6297
Julia AndreasenDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7874-020X
Marcus E EngdahlESA-ESRIN, Largo Galileo Galilei 1, 00044 Frascati, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antarctic ice shelves moderate the contribution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet to global sea level rise; however, ice shelf health remains poorly constrained. Here, we present the annual mass budget of all Antarctic ice shelves from 1997 to 2021. Out of 162 ice shelves, 71 lost mass, 29 gained mass, and 62 did not change mass significantly. Of the shelves that lost mass, 68 had statistically significant negative mass trends, 48 lost more than 30% of their initial mass, and basal melting was the dominant contributor to that mass loss at a majority (68%). At many ice shelves, mass losses due to basal melting or iceberg calving were significantly positively correlated with grounding line discharge anomalies; however, the strength and form of this relationship varied substantially between ice shelves. Our results illustrate the utility of partitioning high-resolution ice shelf mass balance observations into its components to quantify the contributors to ice shelf mass change and the response of grounded ice.

Identifiers

PMID37824617
PMCPMC11650781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.