ArticlePloS one2023
CARRoT: R-package for predictive modelling by means of regression, adjusted for multiple regularisation methods.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A nomograph model for predicting the risk of diabetes nephropathy.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
- A case-control study on QEEG as a marker of cognition in depression.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present an R-package for predictive modelling, CARRoT (Cross-validation, Accuracy, Regression, Rule of Ten). CARRoT is a tool for initial exploratory analysis of the data, which performs exhaustive search for a regression model yielding the best predictive power with heuristic 'rules of thumb' and expert knowledge as regularization parameters. It uses multiple hold-outs in order to internally validate the model. The package allows to take into account multiple factors such as collinearity of the predictors, event per variable rules (EPVs) and R-squared statistics during the model selection. In addition, other constraints, such as forcing specific terms and restricting complexity of the predictive models can be used. The package allows taking pairwise and three-way interactions between variables into account as well. These candidate models are then ranked by predictive power, which is assessed via multiple hold-out procedures and can be parallelised in order to reduce the computational time. Models which exhibited the highest average predictive power over all hold-outs are returned. This is quantified as absolute and relative error in case of continuous outcomes, accuracy and AUROC values in case of categorical outcomes. In this paper we briefly present statistical framework of the package and discuss the complexity of the underlying algorithm. Moreover, using CARRoT and a number of datasets available in R we provide comparison of different model selection techniques: based on EPVs alone, on EPVs and R-squared statistics, on lasso regression, on including only statistically significant predictors and on stepwise forward selection technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.