Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37824509›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein poorly predicts bone mineral density: A NHANES 2017-2020 analysis.

Sarah E Little-Letsinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence and relative risk of fractures and osteoporosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah E Little-LetsingerDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5818-9676
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A reliable, widely available method to detect osteoporosis prior to fracture is needed. Serum levels of C-reactive protein may independently predict low bone mineral density (BMD) and high fracture risk. Existing empirical data focus on sexually and/or racially homogenous populations. This study tests the hypotheses that: C-reactive protein (1) negatively correlates with BMD and (2) fracture history, and (3) independently predicts BMD and fracture history in a diverse population. NHANES 2017-2020 pre-pandemic cycle data were analyzed in R studio. Strength and direction of relationships (-1 to +1) between variables were determined using Kendall's rank correlation coefficient (τ). Linear models were optimized to predict femoral neck or lumbar spine BMD. C-reactive protein positively correlated with femoral (τ = 0.09, p<0.0001) and spine BMD (τ = 0.10, p<0.0001). Individuals identifying as female demonstrated more robust, but still weak, correlations between C-reactive protein and femoral neck (τ = 0.15, p<0.0001; male, τ = 0.06, p = 0.051) and spine BMD (τ = 0.16, p<0.0001; male, τ = 0.06, p = 0.04). C-reactive protein positively correlated with fracture history (τ = 0.083, p = 0.0009). C-reactive protein significantly predicted femoral neck (R2 = 0.022, p = 0.0001) and spine BMD (R2 = 0.028, p<0.0001) and fracture history (R2 = 0.015, p<0.0001). Exploratory analyses identified weight was the single best predictor for femoral neck (R2 = 0.24, p<0.0001) and spine BMD (R2 = 0.21, p<0.0001). In sum, C-reactive protein statistically correlates with and predicts femoral neck and spine BMD, but the magnitude is too low to be biologically meaningful. While weight is a more robust predictor, individuals who are overweight or obese account for nearly half of all osteoporotic fractures, limiting the predictive power of this variable at identifying individuals at risk for osteoporosis. Identification of a robust predictor of fracture risk in a diverse population and across of range of body weights and compositions is needed.

Indexed as

Bone DensityOsteoporosisAbsorptiometry, PhotonC-Reactive ProteinFemaleFemur NeckHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleNutrition SurveysC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID37824509
PMCPMC10569631
OpenAlexW4387569052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.