Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37824507›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2023

Effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 and at high risk of hospitalization: Systematic review and meta-analyses of observational studies.

Kathiaja Miranda Souza, Gabriela Carrasco, Robin Rojas-Cortés, Mariana Michel Barbosa, Eduardo Henrique Ferreira Bambirra, José Luis Castro, Juliana Alvares-Teodoro

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial of Plitidepsin, a Marine-Derived Compound, in Hospitalized Adults With Moderate COVID-19.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathiaja Miranda SouzaIndependent Consultant, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9054-4794
Gabriela CarrascoRed Argentina Pública de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias (REDARETS), Neuquén, Argentina.
Robin Rojas-CortésDepartment of Health Systems and Services, Pan American Health Organization, Unit of Medicines and Health Technologies, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Mariana Michel BarbosaPostgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Eduardo Henrique Ferreira BambirraPostgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1590-8500
José Luis CastroFundación Para la Innovación, la Formación, la Investigación y el Desarrollo Comunitário (FÜNDEC), San Isidro, S/C de Tenerife, España.
Juliana Alvares-TeodoroPostgraduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRCentro de Investigación y Desarrollo · ESCentro Universitário de Belo Horizonte · BRWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the effectiveness of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir in the treatment of outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19 who are at higher risk of developing severe illness, through a systematic review with meta-analyses of observational studies.

methodsA systematic search was performed, in accordance with the Cochrane search methods, to identify observational studies that met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes of mortality and hospitalization were analyzed. Search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently screened references, selected the studies, extracted the data, assessed the risk of bias using ROBINS-I tool and evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE tool. This study followed the PRISMA reporting guideline.

resultsA total of 16 observational studies were finally included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that in comparison to standard treatment without antivirals, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir reduced the risk of death by 59% (OR = 0.41; 95% CI: 0.35-0.52; moderate certainty of evidence). In addition, a 53% reduction in the risk of hospital admission was observed (OR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.36-0.60, with very low certainty of evidence). For the composite outcome of hospitalization and/or mortality, there was a 56% risk reduction (OR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.31-0.64, moderate certainty of evidence).

conclusionThe results suggest that nirmatrelvir-ritonavir could be effective in reducing mortality and hospitalization. The results were valid in vaccinated or unvaccinated high-risk individuals with COVID-19. Data from ongoing and future trials may further advance our understanding of the effectiveness and safety of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and help improve treatment guidelines for COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHospitalizationHumansLactamsLeucineNitrilesProlineRitonavirLactamsLeucinenirmatrelvirNitrilesProlineRitonavir

Identifiers

PMID37824507
PMCPMC10569636
OpenAlexW4387569026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.