ArticlePloS one2023
Effect of pharmacist-led intervention protocol on preventing postoperative delirium after elective cardiovascular surgery.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic literature review of the impact of psychiatric pharmacists: SLR2.The mental health clinician · 2025Review
- Usefulness of protocol-based pharmacotherapy management by pharmacists in cancer patients: a retrospective observational study.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025Article
- Impact of a Physician-led Strike Early-Strike Strong Lipid-Lowering Protocol Incorporating PCSK9 Inhibitors for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Article
- Dual Orexin Receptor Antagonists for Delirium: A Scoping Review and Feasibility Trial of Daridorexant.Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison PsychiatryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative delirium (PD) is an acute brain dysfunction, with a particularly high incidence after cardiovascular surgery. Pharmacist-led interventions show limited evidence in attenuating PD in cardiovascular surgery. In this retrospective cohort study, we aimed to clarify the risk factors of PD for cardiovascular surgery focused on pharmacotherapy and elucidate the effect of pharmacist-led intervention on the PD attenuation rate based on protocol-based pharmaceutical management (PBPM). This study included 142 adult patients who underwent elective valve replacement or valvuloplasty. The risk factors for PD were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Taking risk factors into consideration, a protocol was developed to discontinue benzodiazepines prescriptions by ward pharmacists, and replace with ramelteon and suvorexant if all the following factors apply: 1) number of medications ≥ 6 drugs, 2) number of doses to take ≥ 4 times, and 3) regular use of benzodiazepines or insomnia. Subsequently, the PD rate was compared during a period of two years and 6 months between the pre-PBPM (n = 39) and post-PBPM (n = 62). The PD rate for elective valve replacement or valvuloplasty was 25% (35/142). The adjusted odds ratio for polypharmacy was 3.3 (95% confidence interval: 1.2-8.9, p = 0.016), suggesting that preoperative risk assessment may be essential for patients with polypharmacy. The PD rate significantly decreased to 13% (8/62) in the post-PBPM group compared with 33% (13/39) in the pre-PBPM group (p = 0.014). There was a significant decrease in benzodiazepines use in post-PBPM compared with pre-PBPM (p = 0.026); however, the rate of ramelteon and orexin receptor antagonists use increased by PBPM introduction (p < 0.001). Although the present PBPM still requires further modification, it is simple and potentially useful for pharmacists to assess the risk of patients undergoing any elective cardiovascular surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.