Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37824482›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Measuring the financial impact of disabilities in India (an analysis of national sample survey data).

Jeetendra Yadav, Niharika Tripathi, Geetha R Menon, Saritha Nair, Jitenkumar Singh, Ravinder Singh, M Vishnu Vardhana Rao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeetendra YadavICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7666-4995
Niharika TripathiDepartment of Sociology, Indraprastha College for Women, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7502-132X
Geetha R MenonICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), New Delhi, India.
Saritha NairICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), New Delhi, India.
Jitenkumar SinghICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), New Delhi, India.
Ravinder SinghIndian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India.
M Vishnu Vardhana RaoICMR-National Institute of Medical Statistics (NIMS), New Delhi, India.
National Institute of Medical Statistics · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INUniversity of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with disabilities are vulnerable because of the many challenges they face attitudinal, physical, and financial. The National Policy for Persons with Disabilities (2006) recognizes that Persons with Disabilities are valuable human resources for the country and seeks to create an environment that provides equal opportunities, and protection of their rights, and full. There are limited studies on health care burden due to disabilities of various types.

aimThe present study examines the socioeconomic and state-wise differences in the prevalence of disabilities and related household financial burden in India.

methodsData for this study was obtained from the National Sample Survey (NSS), 76th round Persons with Disabilities in India Survey 2018. The survey covered a sample of 1,18,152 households, 5,76,569 individuals, of which 1,06,894 of had any disability. This study performed descriptive statistics, and bivariate estimates.

resultsThe finding of the analysis showed that prevalence of disability of any kind was 22 persons per 1000. Around, one-fifth (20.32%) of the household's monthly consumption expenditure was spent on out-of-pocket expenditure for disability. More than half (57.1%) of the households were pushed to catastrophic health expenditure due to one of the members being disabled. Almost one-fifth (19.1%) of the households who were above the poverty line before one of members was treated for disability were pushed below the poverty line after the expenditure of the treatment and average percentage shortfall in income from the poverty line was 11.0 percent due to disability treatment care expenditure.

conclusionThe study provides an insight on the socioeconomic differentials in out-of-pocket expenditure, catastrophic expenditure for treatment of any kind of disability. To attain SDG goal 3 that advocates healthy life and promote well-being for all at all ages, there is a need to recognize the disadvantaged and due to disability.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesCatastrophic IllnessFamily CharacteristicsHealth ExpendituresHumansIncomeIndiaPoverty

Identifiers

PMID37824482
PMCPMC10569625
OpenAlexW4387595389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.