Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37824474›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

U-Net based vessel segmentation for murine brains with small micro-magnetic resonance imaging reference datasets.

Christoph Praschl, Lydia M Zopf, Emma Kiemeyer, Ines Langthallner, Daniel Ritzberger, Adrian Slowak, Martin Weigl, Valentin Blüml, Nebojša Nešić, Miloš Stojmenović and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christoph PraschlDepartment of Medical and Bioinformatics, School of Informatics, Communications and Media, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg i. M., Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9711-4818
Lydia M ZopfLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology in the AUVA trauma research center, Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4895-0596
Emma KiemeyerDepartment of Medical and Bioinformatics, School of Informatics, Communications and Media, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg i. M., Austria.
Ines LangthallnerDepartment of Medical and Bioinformatics, School of Informatics, Communications and Media, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg i. M., Austria.
Daniel RitzbergerDepartment of Medical and Bioinformatics, School of Informatics, Communications and Media, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg i. M., Austria.
Adrian SlowakDepartment of Medical and Bioinformatics, School of Informatics, Communications and Media, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg i. M., Austria.
Martin WeiglDepartment of Medical and Bioinformatics, School of Informatics, Communications and Media, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg i. M., Austria.
Valentin BlümlVienna BioCenter Core Facilities GmbH (VBCF), Vienna, Austria.
Nebojša NešićFaculty of Informatics and Computation, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia.
Miloš StojmenovićFaculty of Informatics and Computation, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia.
Kathrin M KniewallnerInstitute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Ludwig AignerInstitute of Molecular Regenerative Medicine, Spinal Cord Injury and Tissue Regeneration Center Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Stephan WinklerDepartment of Medical and Bioinformatics, School of Informatics, Communications and Media, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Hagenberg i. M., Austria.
Andreas WalterVienna BioCenter Core Facilities GmbH (VBCF), Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification and quantitative segmentation of individual blood vessels in mice visualized with preclinical imaging techniques is a tedious, manual or semiautomated task that can require weeks of reviewing hundreds of levels of individual data sets. Preclinical imaging, such as micro-magnetic resonance imaging (μMRI) can produce tomographic datasets of murine vasculature across length scales and organs, which is of outmost importance to study tumor progression, angiogenesis, or vascular risk factors for diseases such as Alzheimer's. Training a neural network capable of accurate segmentation results requires a sufficiently large amount of labelled data, which takes a long time to compile. Recently, several reasonably automated approaches have emerged in the preclinical context but still require significant manual input and are less accurate than the deep learning approach presented in this paper-quantified by the Dice score. In this work, the implementation of a shallow, three-dimensional U-Net architecture for the segmentation of vessels in murine brains is presented, which is (1) open-source, (2) can be achieved with a small dataset (in this work only 8 μMRI imaging stacks of mouse brains were available), and (3) requires only a small subset of labelled training data. The presented model is evaluated together with two post-processing methodologies using a cross-validation, which results in an average Dice score of 61.34% in its best setup. The results show, that the methodology is able to detect blood vessels faster and more reliably compared to state-of-the-art vesselness filters with an average Dice score of 43.88% for the used dataset.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsBrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingMice

Identifiers

PMID37824474
PMCPMC10569551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.