Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37824377›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2023

Feedback From Automatic Speech Recognition to Elicit Clear Speech in Healthy Speakers.

Sarah E Gutz, Marc F Maffei, Jordan R Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah E GutzDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-1601-0639
Marc F MaffeiDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-6341-1702
Jordan R GreenDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0002-1464-1373

Funding

TRAINING FOR SPEECH AND HEARING SCIENCEST32DC000038 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Gwenaelle S Geleoc · 1992 to 2026
$21.8M
Prolonging Functional Speech in Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Real-Time Virtual Vocal TractK24DC016312 · NIDCD · MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS · PI GREEN, JORDAN R · 2017 to 2021
$949k
Kinematic and Acoustic Analysis of Speech in Autism Spectrum DisorderF31DC020108 · NIDCD · MGH INSTITUTE OF HEALTH PROFESSIONS · PI MAFFEI, MARC · 2021 to 2023
$104k
Clear speech in ALS: Effects of feedback from a novel ASR practice paradigm and practice dosageF31DC019016 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI GUTZ, SARAH · 2020 to 2021
$73k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC019016NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC020108NIDCD NIH HHS K24 DC016312NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study assessed the effectiveness of feedback generated by automatic speech recognition (ASR) for eliciting clear speech from young, healthy individuals. As a preliminary step toward exploring a novel method for eliciting clear speech in patients with dysarthria, we investigated the effects of ASR feedback in healthy controls. If successful, ASR feedback has the potential to facilitate independent, at-home clear speech practice.

methodTwenty-three healthy control speakers (ages 23-40 years) read sentences aloud in three speaking modes: Habitual, Clear (over-enunciated), and in response to ASR feedback (ASR). In the ASR condition, we used Mozilla DeepSpeech to transcribe speech samples and provide participants with a value indicating the accuracy of the ASR's transcription. For speakers who achieved sufficiently high ASR accuracy, noise was added to their speech at a participant-specific signal-to-noise ratio to ensure that each participant had to over-enunciate to achieve high ASR accuracy.

resultsCompared to habitual speech, speech produced in the ASR and Clear conditions was clearer, as rated by speech-language pathologists, and more intelligible, per speech-language pathologist transcriptions. Speech in the Clear and ASR conditions aligned on several acoustic measures, particularly those associated with increased vowel distinctiveness and decreased speaking rate. However, ASR accuracy, intelligibility, and clarity were each correlated with different speech features, which may have implications for how people change their speech for ASR feedback.

conclusionsASR successfully elicited outcomes similar to clear speech in healthy speakers. Future work should investigate its efficacy in eliciting clear speech in people with dysarthria.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionDysarthriaFeedbackHumansSpeech AcousticsSpeech Intelligibility

Identifiers

PMID37824377
PMCPMC10721250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.