Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37824222›Full record

ArticleEmotion (Washington, D.C.)2024

Social microclimates and well-being.

Andrea L Courtney, Dean Baltiansky, Wicia M Fang, Mahnaz Roshanaei, Yunus C Aybas, Natalie A Samuels, Everett Wetchler, Zhengxuan Wu, Matthew O Jackson, Jamil Zaki

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Social microclimates and well-being.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea L CourtneyDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0003-1214-9649
Dean BaltianskyDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Wicia M FangDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Mahnaz RoshanaeiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Yunus C AybasDepartment of Economics, Stanford University.
Natalie A SamuelsDepartment of Psychology, University of California at Berkeley.
Everett WetchlerDepartment of Psychology, University of California at Berkeley.
Zhengxuan WuSymbolic Systems Program, Stanford University.
Matthew O JacksonDepartment of Economics, Stanford University.ORCID 0000-0001-9846-4249
Jamil ZakiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University.
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Social factors in the mental health of young adults: Bridging psychological and network analysisR01MH125974 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ZAKI, JAMIL · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH125974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional well-being has a known relationship with a person's direct social ties, including friendships; but do ambient social and emotional features of the local community also play a role? This work takes advantage of university students' assignment to different local networks-or "social microclimates"-to probe this question. Using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, we quantify the collective impact of individual, social network, and microclimate factors on the emotional well-being of a cohort of first-year college students. Results indicate that well-being tracks individual factors but also myriad social and microclimate factors, reflecting one's peers and social surroundings. Students who belonged to emotionally stable and tight-knit microclimates (i.e., had emotionally stable friends or resided in densely connected residence halls) reported lower levels of psychological distress and higher levels of life satisfaction, even when controlling for factors such as personality and social network size. Although rarely discussed or acknowledged in the policies that create them, social microclimates are consequential to well-being, especially during life transitions. The effects of microclimate factors are small relative to some individual factors; however, they explain unique variance in well-being that is not directly captured by emotional stability or other individual factors. These findings are novel, but preliminary, and should be replicated in new samples and contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

FriendsMicroclimateHumansPeer GroupPersonality

Identifiers

PMID37824222
PMCPMC11009067
OpenAlexW4387579259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.