Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37824185›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Democratizing Artificial Intelligence Imaging Analysis With Automated Machine Learning: Tutorial.

Arun James Thirunavukarasu, Kabilan Elangovan, Laura Gutierrez, Yong Li, Iris Tan, Pearse A Keane, Edward Korot, Daniel Shu Wei Ting

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. A review of ophthalmology education in the era of generative artificial intelligence.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arun James ThirunavukarasuUniversity of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8968-4768
Kabilan ElangovanArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7711-7368
Laura GutierrezArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7416-2350
Yong LiArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8949-8612
Iris TanArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0005-5049-3725
Pearse A KeaneMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9239-745X
Edward KorotByers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5687-1564
Daniel Shu Wei TingArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2264-7174

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T019050/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning-based clinical imaging analysis underlies diagnostic artificial intelligence (AI) models, which can match or even exceed the performance of clinical experts, having the potential to revolutionize clinical practice. A wide variety of automated machine learning (autoML) platforms lower the technical barrier to entry to deep learning, extending AI capabilities to clinicians with limited technical expertise, and even autonomous foundation models such as multimodal large language models. Here, we provide a technical overview of autoML with descriptions of how autoML may be applied in education, research, and clinical practice. Each stage of the process of conducting an autoML project is outlined, with an emphasis on ethical and technical best practices. Specifically, data acquisition, data partitioning, model training, model validation, analysis, and model deployment are considered. The strengths and limitations of available code-free, code-minimal, and code-intensive autoML platforms are considered. AutoML has great potential to democratize AI in medicine, improving AI literacy by enabling "hands-on" education. AutoML may serve as a useful adjunct in research by facilitating rapid testing and benchmarking before significant computational resources are committed. AutoML may also be applied in clinical contexts, provided regulatory requirements are met. The abstraction by autoML of arduous aspects of AI engineering promotes prioritization of data set curation, supporting the transition from conventional model-driven approaches to data-centric development. To fulfill its potential, clinicians must be educated on how to apply these technologies ethically, rigorously, and effectively; this tutorial represents a comprehensive summary of relevant considerations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningBenchmarkingEducational StatusHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAI engineeringartificial intelligenceautomated machine learningautomationautoMLautonomous AIdemocratizationimage analysisimagingmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID37824185
PMCPMC10603560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.