ArticleJournal of global health2023
Development of a national proficiency test for SARS-CoV-2 detection by PCR in Colombia.
Article in Journal of global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proficiency testing (PT) is a tool for ensuring the validity of results of testing laboratories and is essential when laboratories are working with assays authorised for emergency use or implementing novel techniques for detecting emerging pathogens. Methods: In collaboration with the National Health Institute of Colombia and with international support, we developed a qualitative PT for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A proficiency test item (PTI) based on reference material (research grade) produced by the National Institute of Standards and Technologies (NIST) was prepared and characterised using three positive samples with varying concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) and two negative (control) samples. Tests were distributed to 121 laboratories across the national network of public health laboratories in Colombia. Results: Positive samples had varying concentrations of SARS-CoV-2 RNA and were quantified by digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) assays for the E gene of SARS-CoV-2. We tested the ability of laboratories to detect low and high levels of viral RNA using samples with SARS-CoV-2 RNA concentrations of 1417 ± 216, 146 ± 28, and 14 ± 10 copies /uL (expanded uncertainty, k = 2, 95% confidence level) We also performed a semiquantitative analysis of instrumental responses (Ct values) reported by participating laboratories and homogeneity, stability, and characterisation studies of the produced materials to determine the adequacy of these materials and methods for use in the qualitative PT scheme. The PT evaluated reports for individual target genes from each laboratory; 98.3% of laboratories had satisfactory performance and the remaining 1.7% of laboratories had unsatisfactory performance for the detection of at least one of the reported genes. Conclusions: This PT scheme identified the potential metrological weaknesses of laboratories in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR and may facilitate improvements in the quality of measurements from the perspective of public health surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.