Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37824135›Full record

Observational studyInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023

Presumed Müller Cell Activation in Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome.

Maria Vittoria Cicinelli, Matteo Menean, Aurelio Apuzzo, Pierluigi Scandale, Alessandro Marchese, Ugo Introini, Maurizio Battaglia Parodi, Francesco Bandello, Elisabetta Miserocchi

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Maria Vittoria CicinelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Matteo MeneanSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Aurelio ApuzzoSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Pierluigi ScandaleSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro MarcheseSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Ugo IntroiniSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio Battaglia ParodiSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco BandelloSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Elisabetta MiserocchiSchool of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the foveal changes occurring in multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS) using multimodal imaging techniques with a specific focus on hyper-reflective dots (HRDs). Methods: This was a retro-prospective observational study including 35 eyes with active MEWDS. Structural and en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed, with follow-up visits at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 2 months from baseline. HRD percentage area (HRD % area) was calculated in a 600 µm fovea centered circle on en face OCT, after background subtraction and image binarization. HRD % area was compared with 23 fellow control eyes. Longitudinal changes in the HRD % areas were assessed using repeated-measure statistics. Results: HRDs were observed as scattered hyper-reflective spots on the vitreoretinal interface on en face OCT images, colocalizing with HRDs or vertical hyper-reflective lines on structural OCT images. The baseline evaluation showed a significantly higher HRD % area in MEWDS eyes compared to fellow eyes (0.10 ± 0.03 vs. 0.08 ± 0.04, P = 0.01). The HRD % area correlated positively with LogMAR visual acuity and inversely with the duration of symptoms. Longitudinal analysis revealed a significant reduction in the HRD % area over time. There was no significant interaction between the rate of HRD disappearance and clinical or demographic factors at baseline. Conclusions: As HRD potentially represents the end-feet projections of activated Müller cells on the retinal surface, this study supports the involvement of Müller cells in the pathogenesis of the disease. The findings highlight the potential of en face OCT imaging for monitoring the progression of MEWDS.

Indexed as

Retinal DiseasesWhite Dot SyndromesEpendymoglial CellsFluorescein AngiographyHumansRetinaRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID37824135
PMCPMC10587856
OpenAlexW4387564090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.