ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2024
Comparison of temperature changes in different irrigation methods used in guided piezosurgery: in vitro study.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study aimed to investigate the cooling performance of three different surgical methods for bone splitting during implant dentistry procedures.
methodsAn in vitro study was conducted on bovine ribs to test the cooling performance of three osteotomy methods: conventional osteotomy with standard cooling irrigation, template-assisted osteotomy with standard cooling irrigation, and modified template-assisted osteotomy with additional cooling fluid through internal irrigation channels in the surgical guide. A negative control group without cooling was also included. Temperature measurements were taken during the procedures using a contactless infrared thermometer.
resultsThe results showed that the conventional osteotomy without cooling resulted in the highest mean of the peak temperatures (114.7 °C ± 45.4), while the modified template-assisted osteotomy with additional cooling achieved the lowest mean of the peak temperatures (29.4 °C ± 7). Statistically significant differences in temperature were observed among the groups (p < 0.001).
conclusionThe study rejected the null hypothesis and demonstrated that the cooling method used during bone splitting procedures significantly affected the temperature development at the surgical site. The modified template-assisted osteotomy with additional cooling provided the best cooling performance. However, caution should be exercised in interpreting the results due to the limitations of the in vitro study. Further research with stronger external validity is needed to confirm these findings and explore their applicability in clinical settings to benefit patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.