Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37823933›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2023

Novel plant disease detection techniques-a brief review.

Srividya Attaluri, Rathnaprabha Dharavath

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plant Biotic Stress: Tools and Techniques for Crop Protection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A Lateral Flow-Recombinase Polymerase Amplification Method forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Srividya AttaluriNational Institute of Technology, Warangal, Telangana, India. vidya.attaluri@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2793-9320
Rathnaprabha DharavathNational Institute of Technology, Warangal, Telangana, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant pathogens cause severe losses to agricultural yield worldwide. Tracking plant health and early disease detection is important to reduce the disease spread and thus economic loss. Though visual scouting has been practiced from former times, detection of asymptomatic disease conditions is difficult. So, DNA-based and serological methods gained importance in plant disease detection. The progress in advanced technologies challenges the development of rapid, non-invasive, and on-field detection techniques such as spectroscopy. This review highlights various direct and indirect ways of detecting plant diseases like Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Lateral flow assays, Polymerase chain reaction, spectroscopic techniques and biosensors. Although these techniques are sensitive and pathogen-specific, they are more laborious and time-intensive. As a consequence, a lot of interest is gained in in-field adaptable point-of-care devices with artificial intelligence-assisted pathogen detection at an early stage. More recently computer-aided techniques like neural networks are gaining significance in plant disease detection by image processing. In addition, a concise report on the latest progress achieved in plant disease detection techniques is provided.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePlantsPlant DiseasesPolymerase Chain ReactionDNAImage processingNeural networksPlant diseaseVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.