Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37823904›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

PROMIS physical function and pain perform poorly psychometrically in patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Hailey P Huddleston, Ophelie Lavoie-Gagne, Nabil Mehta, Justin M Walsh, Michael C Fu, Brian Forsythe, Nikhil N Verma, Brian J Cole, Adam B Yanke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hailey P HuddlestonRush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Ophelie Lavoie-GagneRush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Nabil MehtaRush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Justin M WalshRush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Michael C FuRush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Brian ForsytheRush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Nikhil N VermaRush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Brian J ColeRush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Adam B YankeRush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison Street, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. Adam.Yanke@RushOrtho.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9601-4217
Rush University Medical Center · USHospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess the validity, floor and ceiling effects, and dimensionality of PROMIS Physical Function (PF) and Pain compared to legacy patient reported outcome (PRO) measures in patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

methodsPatients who underwent MPFL reconstruction between 2018 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperatively, patients completed the IKDC, VR-12, Kujala, SF-12, KOOS JR, PROMIS PF and Pain surveys. Inter-survey convergence was assessed with Spearman correlations. Psychometric analysis included investigations of inter-survey convergent validity, intra-survey floor and ceiling effects, and Rasch analyses with person-item fit and iterative question elimination model fit testing.

resultsA total of 76 patients (mean age: 22.6 ± 8.4 years) who completed preoperative surveys were included (compliance: 91.7-96.2%). Preoperatively, age was significantly associated with both PROMIS PF (coefficient:  - 0.291, P = 0.005) and Pain scores (coefficient: 0.294, P = 0.002). PROMIS PF had a Very Good correlation with IKDC and PROMIS Pain had a Very Good correlation with KOOS JR. Other correlations ranged from Poor to Good. No significant floor or ceiling effects were observed for any PRO. On iterative question elimination Rasch modelling, only two questions from PROMIS PF remained after 6 rounds of elimination while PROMIS Pain had no questions remaining after 3 rounds of elimination.

conclusionPreoperative PROMIS PF and Pain provided only Fair to Good correlations with most legacy PROs. Although no significant floor and ceiling effects were observed, PROMIS PF and Pain did not perform well psychometrically in this population of patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction. These results suggest PROMIS questionnaires should be used with caution in this population, especially if used in isolation, when discussing clinical expectations with patients. The authors recommend continued use of legacy PROs specific to assessment of patellar instability and function that have established validity in patellar instability populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Indexed as

Joint InstabilityPatellofemoral JointAdolescentAdultHumansLigamentsPainPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultMedial patellofemoral ligamentMedial patellofemoral ligament reconstructionMPFLMPFLRPatient reported outcome measuresPROMIS

Identifiers

PMID37823904
OpenAlexW4387563656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.