Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37823596›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2024

CancerProteome: a resource to functionally decipher the proteome landscape in cancer.

Dezhong Lv, Donghao Li, Yangyang Cai, Jiyu Guo, Sen Chu, Jiaxin Yu, Kefan Liu, Tiantongfei Jiang, Na Ding, Xiyun Jin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Identification and Characterization of Microproteins/ MicroORFs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Switching from messenger RNAs to noncoding RNAs,World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dezhong LvCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.
Donghao LiCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.
Yangyang CaiCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.
Jiyu GuoSchool of Interdisciplinary Medicine and Engineering, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.
Sen ChuCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.
Jiaxin YuCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.
Kefan LiuSchool of Interdisciplinary Medicine and Engineering, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.
Tiantongfei JiangCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.
Na DingCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.
Xiyun JinSchool of Life Science and Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2795-6451
Yongsheng LiSchool of Interdisciplinary Medicine and Engineering, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1914-0727
Juan XuCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3709-4165
Harbin Medical University · CNHarbin Institute of Technology · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32322020Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province ZD2023C007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics have greatly facilitated the large-scale quantification of proteins and microproteins, thereby revealing altered signalling pathways across many different cancer types. However, specialized and comprehensive resources are lacking for cancer proteomics. Here, we describe CancerProteome (http://bio-bigdata.hrbmu.edu.cn/CancerProteome), which functionally deciphers and visualizes the proteome landscape in cancer. We manually curated and re-analyzed publicly available MS-based quantification and post-translational modification (PTM) proteomes, including 7406 samples from 21 different cancer types, and also examined protein abundances and PTM levels in 31 120 proteins and 4111 microproteins. Six major analytical modules were developed with a view to describe protein contributions to carcinogenesis using proteome analysis, including conventional analyses of quantitative and the PTM proteome, functional enrichment, protein-protein associations by integrating known interactions with co-expression signatures, drug sensitivity and clinical relevance analyses. Moreover, protein abundances, which correlated with corresponding transcript or PTM levels, were evaluated. CancerProteome is convenient as it allows users to access specific proteins/microproteins of interest using quick searches or query options to generate multiple visualization results. In summary, CancerProteome is an important resource, which functionally deciphers the cancer proteome landscape and provides a novel insight for the identification of tumor protein markers in cancer.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinNeoplasmsProteomeHumansMass SpectrometryProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomicsProteome

Identifiers

PMID37823596
PMCPMC10767844
OpenAlexW4387564043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.