ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2024
Autoantibodies to beta tubulin in autoimmune liver diseases-Relation to pANCA and clinical relevance.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Autoantibodies in the follow-up of autoimmune hepatitis.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2026Review
- Autoantibodies in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: From Classical Markers to Emerging Targets.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Response to letter to the editor: tubulin beta is not the target of antineutrophil antibodies in primary sclerosing cholangitis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2025Article
- Identification of B cell antigens in solid cancer: initial insights and functional implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Tubulin beta 5 is not the target of antineutrophil antibodies in primary sclerosing cholangitis.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There was evidence that perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (pANCA) in autoimmune liver diseases react with human beta-tubulin-5 (TBB5). Here, we reevaluate the specificity and clinical relevance of anti-TBB5 antibodies. Patients with untreated autoimmune hepatitis (AIH; n = 53), AIH under immunosuppressive therapy (AIH-IS; n = 125), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC; n = 40), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC; n = 250), nonautoimmune liver diseases (n = 158), inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD; n = 30), and healthy individuals (n = 62) were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for IgG- and IgA-antibodies against recombinant human TBB5. pANCA were detected by immunofluorescence test. Sera were absorbed with TBB5 coupled to cyanogen bromide-activated sepharose. Prevalence and reactivity of IgG anti-TBB5 were significantly higher in patients with untreated AIH (68%; arbitrary units [AU] median: 369) than in PSC (28%; AU median: 84, P < 0.001), other liver diseases (14%; AU median: 185, P < 0.0001), IBD (3%; AU median: 111, P < 0.0001), and healthy controls (3%; AU median: 135; P < 0.0001). Anti-TBB5 did not correlate with pANCA, and immunoprecipitation with TBB5 did not abolish pANCA reactivity. In untreated AIH, anti-TBB5-reactivity was significantly higher than in AIH-IS. Transaminases decreased under IS preferentially in anti-TBB5-negative patients. There was no correlation between anti-TBB5-reactivity and histological stages. IgA-anti-TBB5 was mainly found in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD; 39%). Our data do not support TBB5 as an autoantigenic target of pANCA. However, IgG-anti-TBB5 showed high specificity for (untreated) AIH. While they did not correlate with histological and laboratory parameters, their presence may indicate a poor response to IS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.