Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37823394›Full record

ArticleClinical chemistry and laboratory medicine2024

M-protein diagnostics in multiple myeloma patients using ultra-sensitive targeted mass spectrometry and an off-the-shelf calibrator.

Charissa Wijnands, Pieter Langerhorst, Somayya Noori, Jenneke Keizer-Garritsen, Hans J C T Wessels, Jolein Gloerich, Vincent Bonifay, Hélène Caillon, Theo M Luider, Alain J van Gool and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Monitoring Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Multiple Myeloma by Targeted Tracking Serum M-Protein Using Mass Spectrometry (EasyM).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Charissa WijnandsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9057-8751
Pieter LangerhorstDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Somayya NooriDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jenneke Keizer-GarritsenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hans J C T WesselsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jolein GloerichDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vincent BonifaySebia, Lisses, France.
Hélène CaillonBiochemistry Laboratory, Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Theo M LuiderDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alain J van GoolDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thomas DejoieBiochemistry Laboratory, Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Martijn M VanDuijnDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6654-994X
Joannes F M JacobsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLErasmus MC · NLLaboratoire de Biologie Structurale de la Cellule · FRSebia (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMinimal residual disease status in multiple myeloma is an important prognostic biomarker. Recently, personalized blood-based targeted mass spectrometry (MS-MRD) was shown to provide a sensitive and minimally invasive alternative to measure minimal residual disease. However, quantification of MS-MRD requires a unique calibrator for each patient. The use of patient-specific stable isotope labelled (SIL) peptides is relatively costly and time-consuming, thus hindering clinical implementation. Here, we introduce a simplification of MS-MRD by using an off-the-shelf calibrator.

methodsSILuMAB-based MS-MRD was performed by spiking a monoclonal stable isotope labeled IgG, SILuMAB-K1, in the patient serum. The abundance of both M-protein-specific peptides and SILuMAB-specific peptides were monitored by mass spectrometry. The relative ratio between M-protein peptides and SILuMAB peptides allowed for M-protein quantification. We assessed linearity, sensitivity and reproducibility of SILuMAB-based MS-MRD in longitudinally collected sera from the IFM-2009 clinical trial.

resultsA linear dynamic range was achieved of over 5 log scales, allowing for M-protein quantification down to 0.001 g/L. The inter-assay CV of SILuMAB-based MS-MRD was on average 11 %. Excellent concordance between SIL- and SILuMAB-based MS-MRD was shown (R

conclusionsCompared to SIL peptides, SILuMAB-based MS-MRD improves the reproducibility, turn-around-times and cost-efficacy of MS-MRD without diminishing its sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, SILuMAB can be used as a MS-MRD quality control tool to monitor sample preparation efficacy and assay performance.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaHumansIsotopesMass SpectrometryNeoplasm, ResidualPeptidesReproducibility of ResultsIsotopesPeptidesclonotypic peptideminimal residual diseaseM-proteinmultiple myelomatargeted mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID37823394
PMCPMC10808047
OpenAlexW4387563625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.