Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37823212›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023

Nonhuman primates exploit the prior assumption that the visual world is vertical.

Mohammad Farhan Khazali, Nabil Daddaoua, Peter Thier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad Farhan KhazaliEpilepsy Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6701-6563
Nabil DaddaouaNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9854-4027
Peter ThierHertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Cognitive Neurology Laboratory, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5909-4222
Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DENational Institute on Drug Abuse · USUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When human subjects tilt their heads in dark surroundings, the noisiness of vestibular information impedes precise reports on objects' orientation with respect to Earth's vertical axis. This difficulty is mitigated if a vertical visual background is available. Tilted visual backgrounds induce feelings of head tilt in subjects who are in fact upright. This is often explained as a result of the brain resorting to the prior assumption that natural visual backgrounds are vertical. Here, we tested whether monkeys show comparable perceptual mechanisms. To this end we trained two monkeys to align a visual arrow to a vertical reference line that had variable luminance across trials, while including a large, clearly visible background square whose orientation changed from trial to trial. On ∼20% of all trials, the vertical reference line was left out to measure the subjective visual vertical (SVV). When the frame was upright, the monkeys' SVV was aligned with the gravitational vertical. In accordance with the perceptual reports of humans, however, when the frame was tilted it induced an illusion of head tilt as indicated by a bias in SVV toward the frame orientation. Thus all primates exploit the prior assumption that the visual world is vertical.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionVestibule, LabyrinthAnimalsBrainHumansOrientationPhylogenyVisual PerceptionBayesian modelingmultisensory integrationnonhuman primatesvestibular perceptionvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID37823212
PMCPMC11918268
OpenAlexW4387564481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.