Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37823130›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2023

A review of the bioactive properties of Mongolian plants, with a focus on their potential as natural food preservatives.

Munkhjargal Burenjargal, Tuya Narangerel, Tuyagerel Batmunkh, Alideertu Dong, Saruul Idesh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Munkhjargal BurenjargalDepartment of Chemistry National University of Mongolia Ulaanbaatar Mongolia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6708-2990
Tuya NarangerelDepartment of Chemistry National University of Mongolia Ulaanbaatar Mongolia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3854-5992
Tuyagerel BatmunkhDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering National University of Mongolia Ulaanbaatar Mongolia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5080-9452
Alideertu DongCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Engineering Research Center of Dairy Quality and Safety Control Technology, Ministry of Education Inner Mongolia University Hohhot China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2812-3649
Saruul IdeshDepartment of Chemistry National University of Mongolia Ulaanbaatar Mongolia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3614-4084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumers have recently preferred food that is easy to make and of excellent quality, as well as food that is safe, natural, and minimally processed, but has a longer shelf life. Food deteriorates over time as a result of microbiological, chemical, or physical changes. Phytochemicals derived from medicinal and food plants have long been recognized for their biological activity to protect plants. These bioactivities are designed to increase the shelf life of food while inhibiting the growth of microorganisms. The use of natural plant food preservatives containing bioactive compounds as health-promoting agents is particularly intriguing. Furthermore, due to their effectiveness against food spoilage and foodborne pathogens, natural plant-origin antimicrobial compounds have been investigated as alternatives to synthetic antimicrobial compounds for preserving food quality. This review focused on the plant composition and properties that can be utilized as a natural food preservative, as well as the possibilities of using Mongolian medicinal plants.

Indexed as

antibacterialantifungal plantsantioxidantMongolian plantsnatural food preservatives

Identifiers

PMID37823130
PMCPMC10563759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.