ArticleThe Saudi dental journal2023
The effects of anterior bite plane on temporomandibular joint and mandibular morphology.
Article in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: An anterior bite plane (ABP) is an orthodontic appliance that prevents posterior teeth from making contact. This appliance's functional concept is to reduce muscle activity, overcome deep overbite, and temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders (TMD). However, ABP treatment for malocclusion frequently results in unfavorable reversible and irreversible long-term effects. This problem presents difficulties for dentists in developing an appropriate treatment modification plan in order to achieve the best results. As a result, the goal of this study is to observe the effects of different ABP types on the TMJ and mandible. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six three-month-old male Wistar strain rats were divided into three groups: control, upper flat, and upper-lower inclined ABP. The overbite and body weight were measured. TMJ was examined histologically using hematoxylin and eosin (HE). To observe the entire mandibular bone in response to ABP, mandibular planes and angulations were measured. Results: After 7 days, the upper-lower inclined ABP group has significantly lower body weight than the control group. On days 7 and 14, overbite was significantly reduced in both the upper flat and upper-lower inclined ABP groups. The superficial layer of the condyle was depleted in both ABP groups, according to HE analysis. Mandibular angle analysis revealed that the upper-lower inclined ABP group had a greater incisal and ramus angle. Furthermore, lower incisor (Li)-condyle (Co) mandibular points increased significantly more in the upper-lower inclined ABP group than in the control group. Conclusion: According to this study, various forms of ABP may have an impact on the TMJ and mandibular morphology, specifically on the length, angulation, and superficial surface of the condyle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.