ArticleJAAD international2023
Shared decision-making quality and decisional regret in patients with low-risk superficial basal cell carcinoma: A prospective, multicenter cohort study.
Article in JAAD international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient expectations and decisional regret in the management of ventral hernias.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Investigating Quality of Life and Decision Regret in Patients Undergoing Laryngectomy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Adapting the Geriatric Medicine 5Ms Framework to Geriatric Dermatology.Drugs & aging · 2026Review
- Patient perspective on pre-operative communication; a post-operative cross-sectional survey of patients with gastro-intestinal malignancy.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- Mohs Surgery vs. Wide Local Excision for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Comparing Recurrence Rates, Economic Value, and Aesthetic Outcomes.Journal of cancer science and clinical therapeutics · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of question prompt list interventions for patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many therapies are available to treat low-risk superficial basal cell carcinoma (lr-sBCC), which may complicate the shared decision-making (SDM) process. Objective: To assess the SDM process of patients and physicians when deciding lr-sBCC therapy as well as the factors that may influence the SDM process. Methods: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted over 18 months, from October 2018 to April 2020, in 3 tertiary university hospitals and 1 private hospital. Results: This study included 107 patients. There was a weak positive correlation between Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire-Patient version (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire-Physician version (SDM-Q-Doc) (Spearman's correlation coefficient [ Limitations: Patients may have self-selected to participate. Conclusion: This study suggests that some patients may prefer less invasive therapies for lr-sBCC. The SDM process may reduce decisional conflict and decisional regret.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.