ArticleIEEE Haptics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE Haptics Symposium2022
Robotically Embodied Biological Neural Networks to Investigate Haptic Restoration with Neuroprosthetic Hands.
Article in IEEE Haptics Symposium : [proceedings]. IEEE Haptics Symposium, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biohybrid Robotic Hand to Investigate Tactile Encoding and Sensorimotor Integration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroprosthetic limbs reconnect severed neural pathways for control of (and increasingly sensation from) an artificial limb. However, the plastic interaction between robotic and biological components is poorly understood. To gain such insight, we developed a novel noninvasive neuroprosthetic research platform that enables bidirectional electrical communications (action, sensory perception) between a dexterous artificial hand and neuronal cultures living in a multichannel microelectrode array (MEA) chamber. Artificial tactile sensations from robotic fingertips were encoded to mimic slowly adapting (SA) or rapidly adapting (RA) mechanoreceptors. Afferent spike trains were used to stimulate neurons in a region of the neuronal culture. Electrical activity from neurons at another region in the MEA chamber was used as the motor control signal for the artificial hand. Results from artificial neural networks (ANNs) showed that the haptic model used to encode RA or SA fingertip sensations affected biological neural network (BNN) activity patterns, which in turn impacted the behavior of the artificial hand. That is, the exhibited finger tapping behavior of this closed-loop neurorobotic system showed statistical significance (p<0.01) between the haptic encoding methods across two different neuronal cultures and over multiple days. These findings suggest that our noninvasive neuroprosthetic research platform can be used to devise high-throughput experiments exploring how neural plasticity is affected by the mutual interactions between perception and action.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.