Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37822860›Full record

ReviewACS catalysis2023

Decoding Catalysis by Terpene Synthases.

Joshua N Whitehead, Nicole G H Leferink, Linus O Johannissen, Sam Hay, Nigel S Scrutton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS catalysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Palladium-Catalyzed Regiodivergent Telomerization of Isoprene With Oxindoles.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Designed Water Capture in Terpene Synthase Catalysis.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The initial dynamics of product release in terpene synthases-The case of CotB2.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joshua N WhiteheadManchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9978-4631
Nicole G H LeferinkFuture Biomanufacturing Research Hub (FBRH), Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4134-4339
Linus O JohannissenManchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, United Kingdom.
Sam HayManchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3274-0938
Nigel S ScruttonManchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M1 7DN, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-3500

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The review by Christianson, published in 2017 on the twentieth anniversary of the emergence of the field, summarizes the foundational discoveries and key advances in terpene synthase/cyclase (TS) biocatalysis (Christianson, D. W.

Identifiers

PMID37822860
PMCPMC10563020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.