ArticleScanning2023
Prevalence and Morphology of C-Shaped Canals in Mandibular First and Second Molars of an Iranian Population: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment.
Article in Scanning, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of c-shaped canal morphology in premolar and molar teeth assessed by cone-beam computed tomography: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- CBCT-Based Epidemiological Study of Root and Root Canal Anatomy in Mandibular Second Molars in an Italian Clinical Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- C-shaped canal configuration in mandibular second molars of a selected Uyghur adults in Xinjiang: prevalence, correlation, and differences of root canal configuration using cone-beam computed tomography.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Isthmi and Root Canal Configurations in Mandibular Permanent Teeth Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.BioMed research international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The complex anatomy of C-shaped canals poses challenges for clinicians compared to teeth with normal root canal anatomy. This study is aimed at evaluating the frequency and morphology of C-shaped canals in the mandibular first and second molars among an Iranian population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated 369 CBCT scans from the archives of a radiology clinic in Ardabil, Iran. The sample included 248 mandibular first molars and 478 mandibular second molars. The presence of C-shaped canals and their classification, according to Fan et al., were evaluated at four levels: orifice, coronal, middle, and apical. Prevalence based on gender and tooth type was also assessed. Results: A total of 199 (53.9%) males and 170 (46.1%) females were evaluated. C-shaped canals were found in 11 (8 males/3 females) out of 248 (4.4%) first molars and in 20 (11 males/9 females) out of 478 (3.7%) second molars. The C2 configuration was most prevalent in the orifice, coronal, and middle levels of both molar types, while C3 and C4 morphologies were most commonly found apically in the second and first molars, respectively. A significant difference in configuration was found only at the coronal level between molar types. A significant association between gender and configuration was observed only at the orifice level of the second molars. No other significant differences were found ( Conclusion: C-shaped canal configurations should be expected in 4.4% of mandibular first molars and 3.7% of the second molars in this Iranian population, with a predominance of the C2 configuration in the orifice, coronal, and middle levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.