Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37822777›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development

Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study.

Joshua Levy, Kencie Ely, Gemma Lagasca, Hiba Kausar, Deepal Patel, Shaun Andersen, Carlos Georges, Edward Simanton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joshua LevyDepartment of Educational Outcomes and Assessment, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9629-5768
Kencie ElyDepartment of Educational Outcomes and Assessment, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Gemma LagascaDepartment of Educational Outcomes and Assessment, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Hiba KausarDepartment of Educational Outcomes and Assessment, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Deepal PatelDepartment of Educational Outcomes and Assessment, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Shaun AndersenDepartment of Educational Outcomes and Assessment, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Carlos GeorgesDepartment of Computer Science, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
Edward SimantonDepartment of Educational Outcomes and Assessment, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.
University of Nevada, Las Vegas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: As medical schools worldwide condense the preclinical phase of medical education, it is increasingly important to identify resources that help medical students retain and employ the medical information. One popular tool among medical students is an application called Anki, a free and open-source flashcard program utilizing spaced repetition for quick and durable memorization. The purpose of this study is to determine how variable Anki usage among first-year medical students throughout a standardized anatomy and physiology course correlates with performance. Methods: We designed a novel Anki add-on called "Anki Stat Scraper" to collect data on first-year medical students at Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine during their 8-week anatomy and physiology course. Anki users (N = 45) were separated into four groups: Heavy (N = 5), intermediate (N = 5), light (N = 16), and limited-Anki (N = 19) users, based on the time each student spent on the flashcard app, how many flashcards they studied per day, and how many days they used the app prior to their anatomy and physiology exam. A 14-question Likert scale questionnaire was administered to each participant to gauge their understanding of Anki and how they used the app to study. Results: Heavy and intermediate Anki users had higher average exam scores than their counterparts who did not use Anki as a study method. Average exam scores were 90.34%, 91.74%, 85.86%, and 87.75% for heavy, intermediate, light, and limited-Anki users respectively (p > 0.05). Our survey demonstrated that Anki users spent an average of 73.86% of their study time using Anki, compared to an average of 36.53% for limited-Anki users (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Anki users did not score significantly higher compared to limited-Anki users. However, survey responses from students believe that Anki may still be a useful educational tool for future medical students.

Indexed as

anatomyAnkiexam performancemedical schoolspaced repetition

Identifiers

PMID37822777
PMCPMC10563486
OpenAlexW4387464246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.